Summary: Should Physicians Participate In Executions

Decent Essays
After reading the issues contained within “Professional Integrity, I am responding to issue 4.1., “Should Physicians Be Allowed to Participate in Executions”? The argument that I find most compelling is "No", When Law and Ethics Collide- Why Physicians Participate in Executions.
In my opinion, I do not think Physicians should be allowed to participate in executions because they are supposed to fundamentally heal and comfort the sick until their last days of life. Also, I think it’s very unethical for a Physician to be mandated to execute when there is a possibility of suffering. Unfortunately, we do have states today that legalized the death penalty and for that reason I also think that they should have someone else in the criminal justice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commotion where there is no more motion, but there is a choice. According to Ryan T. Anderson the author of “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong,” states that this upcoming proclamation is an ethical battle within our society. The main argument Anderson claims is that there is no base for such right to be implemented. There is no right way to kill someone, killing, especially coming from a health professional is going against the norm of centuries of helping to prolong life; give the body a fair chance to fight and survive. The author states, the solution is better health care provided for the families and patients.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do agree that it cruel and unusual punishment to sentence a clinically insane person to death, but there is a fine line between medicating a person for the sake of protecting them against harm and medicating them for the purpose of lucid…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The alternative way is Euthanasia, which Anderson describes as, “the intentional killing of a patient by doctor”. Anderson claims that this can only lead to Euthanasia because if we are to be logically compassionate, we can’t discriminate the option from patients who are unable to administer the deadly drugs themselves on account of being handicapped in some way. Anderson also states that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. Anderson then again quotes an article from The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, which states four reasons that PAS is a bad idea. The article claims first that it endangers the weak, despite failing safeguards with evidence that in three countries in Europe, “thousands” of cases have been found of doctor’s killing patients without a request.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it ever okay to a doctor to kill someone? most people might agree or disagree kill somebody is a scene. We recognized the radical disruptions that death represent. In a moment these memories the doctor experience it's more of a criminal situations giving shots to your patients in they never wake up that's serious life and death situations. Medical professional codes has a long prohibited physician involvement in assisting a patient's suicide, However despite ethical and legal prohibited, calls for the liberalizations of this ban grown in recent years.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Physician assisted suicide should not be limited to terminally ill patients but those with mental illnesses…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Physician assisted death, should be allowed in all 50 states throughout the United States. Physician assisted death is when you take a drug (pill) that will kill you, but you need to be terminally ill to take this drug. This drug needs to be prescribed by two doctors that agree that you will die in the next 6 months at most. Imagine getting terminally ill and having to sit through the pain on a bed strapped to matcheans. That would be the horrible.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As long as the patient is suffering with excruciating pain, it should be his or her right to choose whether or not they want to request assistance in hastening their death. Going back to a person’s well-being, if death is inevitable in the long run, than there is no harm in quickening the process because the physician is helping them end their suffering not prolong it. Also, in regards to Beauchamp’s argument that law and medicine interfere with the patient’s right to choose how they want to proceed with their time left, we, as Americans, have freewill, and with that it gives us the opportunity to choose how we live our lives. However, some might say it is against the law to kill a human being, but is it really killing when the person is going to die eventually? With physician-assisted suicide the patient must be fully aware in requesting aid in ending their…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dresser, Rebecca S. "Drugs and The Death Penalty. " Webscohost. Hastings Center Report, 1 Jan. 2014. Web.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal in Every State When it comes to the topic of physician-assisted suicide, most of will readily agree that the patient has their right to choose their form of treatment; if they chose death, then the reasoning is that they chose to die with dignity. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of, does allowing patients to die under a doctor’s care deem the death as murder. Some are convinced that it does, other maintain that allowing patients to do so in tern, breaks the Hippocratic Oath. Here in the states, we are very fortunate with every law and amendment that gives us the right to do with what we want with limits.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the wake of terrorist activity around the world and threats of violence at home, the role of interrogation and torture has become a hot button issue in both domestic and global politics. In many interrogation procedures, interrogators have enlisted the help of physicians to provide support in caring for prisoners and assistance in extracting information. Yet, defining the role of physicians in the interrogation of prisoners is controversial. In the interrogation process, physicians are often confronted with competing loyalties of patriotism and ethical medical behavior. Yet, despite the duties that physicians have to their countries, physicians have a higher duty to follow the Hippocratic oath and to do no harm.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I don’t necessarily agree with euthanizing nor ending someone’s life in terms of that is the best answer for them. The only time I would agree in euthanasia are when either the patient is in their last stages of their medical conditions and no treatment is able to prolong their life or maybe when the patient begs you to end their life and you abide to their decisions. For an example, if Dr. Quill’s patient, Patricia, is in their last stage of leukemia and her body is not responding to all the possible treatment options out in the market and nothing the physician can do to prolong her life, that’s when I would have to think about other possibilities. If there really is nothing that the physician can do, we…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When most people hear assisted suicide, the first question that comes up is “Is not assisted suicide just murder?” The majority of people agree it is homicide; even doctors as “[t]rained as they are to preserve life, most doctors are troubled by the thought of helping patients end their lives” (Worsnop). The law has determined that active euthanasia is murder “[s]ince it is tantamount to homicide, [it] is illegal in every state” (Worsnop) but pro-euthanasia groups declare a change needs to be made. Passive euthanasia is legal but it too is murder. If life support is turned off on patients that have no say in the matter, it should also count as organized murder.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose Of Punishment

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is obvious that the main issue is whether to heal a prisoner simply for the purpose of execution or otherwise. The basic undertone to this argument could be whether the government authority has the power to force prisoners or citizens to take drugs without their consent regardless of their status. Another point of argument could be making a prisoner sane before execution is rational or a good reasoning before killing. In this scenario, Charles Laverne Singleton is a prisoner on death row, and he is awaiting execution for the crime of felony capital murder. Singleton became insane while in prison, it can be inferred that his insanity is related to the approaching date of execution.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays