According to the article, “What is the Arabic for democracy?” from The Economist, the article indicates, “Democratic progress and economic reform should be encouraged in Tunisia and Morocco. These are small countries, but the uprisings of 2011 show that small countries can serve as a model for others” (“What is the Arabic for democracy?” 2016). Not everything starts off from a big beginning, so Tunisia and Morocco would be the ideal nations to lead the movement towards democracy, which sparks the attention for a potential change in the overall governmental system in the Arab world. This aspect, however, often leads to many civil wars solely because the leaders are imperialists, and they control a corrupted system of policemen to harass those who revolt their tyrannous power. The relentless continuation of corrupted governmental system also caused many protests among the citizens, which ultimately resulted in innocent executions. These apparent issues can be traced back to the previous successors of the Arab states, as they were mainly monarchical rulers who wages wars among nations to dominate the freedom of those …show more content…
These articles provide some of the most fundamental concepts that led to the downfall of the Arab world and how its people cannot acquire the social relevance they deserve in labor and society. Moreover, the majority of people can blame the oil-curse for the civil wars that continuously occur among these countries. The resources become the main income for the government and big corporations, higher authoritative people will manipulate and willingly declare wars on other nations merely to acquire those resources for their own benefits, and this is what is going on in the Arab world. These articles also convey that protests do matter in politics and society, because it creates an opportunity for a change, and if other nations view these protests as a progression towards a better economy and society, there is a chance that wars will desist to occur and people can have more