Summary Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquis

Improved Essays
Don Marquis’ main thesis in the article Why Abortion is Immoral, explores what makes the act of killing people wrong, which has a direct implication on abortion. Marquis attempts to validate that abortion is the same as the killing of an adult human being, expect in extraordinary circumstances. Just before laying the basis of his argument, Marquis briefly describes the debate over the morality of abortion. He begins the article by observing that the debate of abortion has already reached a standstill. Where the anti-abortionists demonstrate that the fetuses typically display many of the same features as of adult humans. Pro-choicers convincingly contend that embryos do not have the sorts of components that are for the most part taken to be fundamental …show more content…
The problem that Marquis suggests, is that the views on the which anti-abortionists rely are too broad, where as the opposing groups views’ are too narrow. In light of all of this, Marquis recommends adopting a new strategy. He plans to first recognize what clarifies why murdering a grown-up human is conventionally wrong, and after that to check whether that reason can be connected to premature birth. On the off chance that it would, we be able to will have found a solid reason that premature birth is possibly indecent. What isn't right with murdering, Marquis, contends, is that it denies the casualty of something important. Specifically, it denies the casualty of everything that she would have esteemed later on had her life not been rashly finished. Among these things will be different objectives, accomplishments, finished undertakings, connections, tasteful encounters, etc. Executing isn't right since it takes away the estimation of those, and numerous other, encounters. Marquis contends that there are a few attractions to clarifying the misleading quality of murdering along these lines. In any case, it can represent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I am going to argue that Judith Jarvis Thomson is correct when she argues that abortion is not unjust killing and is permissible. Thomson’s argument is based on a woman’s right to decide to have an abortion on the notion that a fetus is regarded as a person from the time of conception. Thomson reaches her final conclusion that abortion is not unjust killing by countering claims from anti-abortionists, such as Don Marquis, and by defining key terms anti-abortionists commonly use in their arguments. I will first begin by briefly introducing Don Marquis’s view regarding abortion. Marquis argues that it is wrong to kill a fetus because it would deprive it of having a “future like ours”, to which he further defines as the future…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are the vast majority of abortions immoral? In “ Why Abortion is Immoral”, Don Marquis argues that they are immoral because the typical fetus has a future like ours so to kill it is to deprive it of a future of value. Marquis’ argument rests on the assumption that the morality of abortion depends on the moral status of the typical fetus and whether killing it is morally wrong. In “A Defense of Abortion”, Judith Jarvis Thomson challenges this assumption by using several analogies to show that under some circumstances, the moral status of the typical fetus does not outweigh a woman’s right to her body. She says that those who assume that a fetus is a human person with high moral status base their argument on that the fetus has a right to life…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marquis wrote that the standard argument against abortion is that life begins at the moment of conception or that fetuses resemble babies or that fetuses possess characteristics such as genetic code that is necessary and sufficient for being a human. He wrote that anti-abortionists think that these claims are quite obviously true and establishing any of the claims above is enough to show that abortion is morally equal to murder. He stated that a good argument concerning abortion requires not only some claim characterizing fetuses but also some overall moral principle that links a characteristic of fetuses to having the right to life. Marquis’ objections which he raised against the standard anti-abortionist view is that it is too broad. Marquis…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I will argue that abortion is not immoral by analyzing two ethical theories natural law and ethical egoism, analyzing Don Marquis’ conclusion of abortion, and discussing my personal position…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ty’onna Key Philosophy Paper Don Marquis claims that abortion is immoral and therefore impermissible in most cases. I will argue that abortion is not immoral and should be permissible in all cases. Marquis says abortion is immoral because you take away the fetus’ right to a future like ours. He believes this is the same as killing an adult human, which is considered immoral. He argues that killing an adult human is wrong and the adult has the same value as a fetus then abortion is also wrong.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The morality of abortion is an argument that has spanned decades with debates on both sides as to whether or not it is right to kill a fetus that is not yet born. Even today, there is still no set motion that humanity follows as a whole, and they have been labelled as being either ‘pro-choice’ or ‘pro-life’ following in their own beliefs as to what is right. There are even many articles, essays, and journals today which exist to validate the point of each of these sides. Many have attempted to make sense of the matter as well including some philosophers. Two of these philosophers include Mary Ann Warren and Don Marquis, who each give their own opinion on the matter quite formally and use many ideologies to back their claims.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, she uses examples to try to explain why abortion is not an immoral act as she treats the fetus as an invader to the woman’s body. Some people however do not agree with Thomson’s depiction of how she defended why abortion should be allowed. With this in mind, I will try to argue that abortion is not an immoral act since women have the right to do whatever they so choose to do with their body, especially in the case that the fetus is as Thomson…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The two approaches bifurcate due to one critical assumption; who exactly has a right to life? I will explore what it means to have a “right to life”, and use my findings to evaluate both Marquis’ arguments in his essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral” and Warren’s arguments in her essay, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”. I will consider some potentially conflicting extensional results on both moral theories, and critique the authors’ responses to each. It must be clarified that abortion, in the ethical sense, refers to “normal” abortion, that is, free of contexts such as…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cynara Collins Phil 230 02/04/2018 Abortion is a serious issue that has been going on for years, many people don’t fully understand abortion, and why people choose to do it. Abortion is the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus. This usually is performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. There are different views on abortion, some agree and some don’t. abortions take place every single day, and yet public opinion remains at a standstill as to whether abortion is ethical or not.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As human beings, there are certain things we value in life. When a human being dies, they no longer have the ability to have all of the pleasurable experiences that they would take part in in the future. “When one is killed, they are deprived both of what they now value which would have been part of my future personal life. Therefore, the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer” (Marquis, 1989). Through this reasoning, I came to the conclusion that killing an innocent adult human being…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays