I have witnessed unkind things happen and have had things said to me over the internet that push me towards agreeing that parents should monitor their children, but I also know that I would like to have privacy just as most people do, which leads me to disagree. Coben’s arguments lack reliability and evidence in places where it is needed, such as when he gives examples of things people have said and when he claims to have done a great deal of research, causing his arguments to be weak. If I were going off his words alone, I would not be very convinced with Coben’s argument because of his absence of logos. I would see things in a new perspective, perhaps, since he gave reasonable examples that have a chance of happening, but I would not be persuaded to put spyware on my child’s
I have witnessed unkind things happen and have had things said to me over the internet that push me towards agreeing that parents should monitor their children, but I also know that I would like to have privacy just as most people do, which leads me to disagree. Coben’s arguments lack reliability and evidence in places where it is needed, such as when he gives examples of things people have said and when he claims to have done a great deal of research, causing his arguments to be weak. If I were going off his words alone, I would not be very convinced with Coben’s argument because of his absence of logos. I would see things in a new perspective, perhaps, since he gave reasonable examples that have a chance of happening, but I would not be persuaded to put spyware on my child’s