Summary Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
Now, as the book progresses on, Zimbardo launches into his experiment which to me is quite interesting and impressive. In this experiment, Zimbardo is wanting to prove that in certain situations, normal good people can turn into perpetrators of evil who commit such behaviors. He calls this, “The Stanford Prison experiment” in which normal individuals were assigned to prisoners and guards as a test of psychology of imprisonment. After having done this, Zimbardo became witness to an extreme number of high levels of unpredicted cruelty. Upon further reading about this case, I must say that I was left surprised by the result as well. Before, knowing the outcome of the experiment myself, I thought that the guards were going to abide by what they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guards forced prisoner to betray each other and treated them below human consideration. Provided the proper situation, Zimbardo’s subjects dehumanizing their inmates could very well behave as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WHY WAS STANFORD’S PRISON EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED? In order to study psychological effects of prison life a experiment was conducted called “Stanford Prison Experiment”. The psychologists wanted to study what were the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this experiment, a team of researchers led by the famous psychology professor named, “Philip Zimbardo” finally decided to set up a replicated prison so that they can carefully note effects of the behavior of all those within the walls of prison.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “What are we? Humans? Animals? Or savages?” Lord of the Flies by William Golding, is truly a phenomenon.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of this experiment allowed for many potential results, there was the possibility that the 2 weeks of the experiment ends up being uneventful. This is however not how it went down, the experiment was cut short due to the horrible things happening in the “prison”. After the first day of the experiment, things escalated quickly and the “Prison Guards” made sure that the “Prisoners” suffered, physically and mentally. The “Prison…

    • 1057 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo says that the experiment showed that power corrupts and that the victims of the abuse had a hard time standing up for themselves. Zimbardo himself experienced this since he was playing the roles of both himself and that of the prison’s superintendent which he states he wouldn’t do the again. He explains that he would have someone else be the prison’s superintendent while he supervised so that he wouldn’t lose himself in the role again. It wasn’t until a colleague of his saw the boys playing the roles of prisoners marching down the hall in chains with bags over their heads that Zimbardo saw just how far this experiment had gone and how into the role he himself had gotten. Even he fell into the conformity of his role even though he wasn’t one of the guards ordering around the prisoners or one of the prisoners having to be obedient to the guards.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the experiment, one set of people were prisoners and the other were guards. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate how people would act when given no rules in a prison. (Shuttleworth 3). The experiment showed that when taken away from society and civilization, people turn into savages and become more evil as time goes on. In this case, some people were given more power than others, therefore they overused it due to their natural selfish state.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment help prisoners receive their basic rights and shed a light on prison guards abusing…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second issue: Disregard of privacy On the day before the experiment would start, randomly assigned guards would arrive at the basement to help set up and pick uniforms, whereas the selected inmates were told to rest at home. What they were not informed of was that they would be arrested by the city police at their home and run through the entire extensive booking procedure. This was a severe disregard of personal privacy and may have been very traumatizing to some volunteers, due to them being in shock.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wore a uniform that would give anyone the impression that it was not a good idea to cause trouble. Once the experiment began, they were given very little instruction as to what they should be doing, or how they should react towards the inmates. Their only rule was that there was to be no physical punishment. At first, everything was calm, almost too calm. Too calm in fact that the head of the project, Phil Zimbardo, was beginning to become frustrated with the calmed nature of the situation.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was unlike any other experiment. It was supposed to be an experiment on how people would conform to the roles of guards and prisoners in a role-playing exercise. Over 70 students applied for the aid, but only 25 was selected and they would get paid 15 dollars a day for their participation in the experiment. They took the 25 college students from the university and turn half of them into guards and the other half into prisoners. The Abu Graib situation was way different in my opinion.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gives an explanation for why individuals behaved in the way they did. In an essence, it has been a significant idea for theories such as the emergent norm and social identity, and models such as SIDE to emerge. After gaining insight towards the correlation between the Theory and the Experiment, one wonders about what makes good people become evil. However, Zimbardo claims through the Lucifer effect that people themselves are not become evil, but it is the negatives that they become. One then questions how individuals become negative; it is through the powerful situations, such as the one created by Zimbardo and his peers in 1971, that individuals get exposed tom that causes the people who were becoming the role, to now the role becoming the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays