Following the logic of the experience-memory theory, the general’s childhood self was not him. Parfit’s psychological continuity holds as a solution to the objection, and states that A is identical to B if they hold “overlapping chains of strong connectedness”. Regarding the previous example through this lens, if the general possesses memories of adolescence, and his adolescent self possessed memories of childhood, then by the transitive property the general would also be his childhood self. Furthermore, if there exists only a single connection between X and Y, then they would not prove to be the same person even with the transitive revision. Therefore, Parfit includes other psychological connections besides memories, such as intentions, beliefs, desires, and characteristics to bridge the two
Following the logic of the experience-memory theory, the general’s childhood self was not him. Parfit’s psychological continuity holds as a solution to the objection, and states that A is identical to B if they hold “overlapping chains of strong connectedness”. Regarding the previous example through this lens, if the general possesses memories of adolescence, and his adolescent self possessed memories of childhood, then by the transitive property the general would also be his childhood self. Furthermore, if there exists only a single connection between X and Y, then they would not prove to be the same person even with the transitive revision. Therefore, Parfit includes other psychological connections besides memories, such as intentions, beliefs, desires, and characteristics to bridge the two