Nature Of Evil Research Paper

Superior Essays
The argument from evil, supposes that because there is evil in the world, God therefore cannot be omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. These characteristics are used to describe the essence of the God of Christianity, so according to the argument from evil, God does not exist. Because if He did exist as an all-powerful, loving being, He would not allow such evil to prevail. So, does the fact of evil make it irrational to believe in God? No, the fact of evil does not make it irrational to believe in God. Evil is real and is a result of our free will, which, I will argue, is the only plausible way God, who is characterized by His full attributes described in traditional theism, could have destined humanity to live. Further, a free world where evil exists is the only world where humans may become complete creations. In a free world, where we are presented with genuine choices of right or wrong, we are therefore able to grow morally, to become complete beings in communion with God. …show more content…
However, it is a necessary consequence. Humanity has been created in the image of God which includes the necessity of free will. When one harms another, the action of harm is the result of sinful willing, which we are capable of because of God’s choosing to make us free. Similarly, when one shows compassion to another, the action of compassion is the result of moral willing, which we are also capable of because of our free will. Free will provides one with choices to act either morally or immorally, and without this autonomy humanity would exist as carefree robots, preprogrammed and uncapable of genuine feeling. By giving us free will, God is creating with goodness, because a world devoid of the possibility of moral evil would be one in which we did not exist. If we value our free will, something that defines us as humans, living with the risk of moral evil is a necessity of the human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Free will needs to be there in order for deeper goods to come from it. There needs to be a choice of good and evil so evil is not necessary. As for natural evil possibilities, the evil would be consistent with God. The natural possibilities of evil are explained through three premises. If God is omnibenevolent, then He seeks to give us the deepest of goods, if God seeks to give us the deepest of goods, He will give us free and responsible choice, if God gives us that choice, then there exists the natural possibility of evil.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Frivolity of Evil In his article titled “the frivolity of evil,” Dr. Dalrymple admits that he has become preoccupied with the problem of evil. Specifically the evil found in the everyday actions of men. This brand of evil spreads through a community like a virus until no one is left untouched. Through the insight he has gained working as a prison psychiatrist, Dr. Dalrymple has been able to find the answers to the questions that occupied his mind for the past fourteen years” why do people commit evil, what conditions allow it to flourish, how it is best prevented?”…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Possibility Of Evil

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The short story “The Possibility of Evil” by Shirley Jackson is about an old woman named Miss Strangeworth who is determined to rid “Strangeworth Town” of evil, yet she does not notice that she is causing evil herself. Although she seems like a proper, nice old lady, when she goes home every day, she writes cruel letters to the people in her town. Miss Strangeworth notices that everyone in the town is distressed and she wonders why. She refuses to acknowledge that she is truly evil herself. No one in that town would suspect her sending rude letters to everyone.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps the free will argument cannot apply when people die in a natural disaster, but it does apply when a person decides to commit a crime. Some evils may even be a combination of reasons; for example, imagine a firefighter that died while saving people from a burning house. This death can be justified by the fact that he was given free will to choose to risk his life for other people, and it also shows higher virtues, such as selflessness and bravery. Different kinds of evil can have different reasons for existing; a natural disaster killing hundreds of people is a very different scenario from a murderer killing a person out of spite. It seems odd to even group these kinds of “evils” in to the same category.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Second, God created every human. Third, God knew what each human would choose when he created them. If all of these statements are true, this leads us to our fourth point. God is omniscient, created everyone, and knows what humans choose, therefore, God is partially responsible for the evil actions that are freely chosen by humans (Lecture 9/7).…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil is an ancient theological problem that has been in existence for a long time. Evil is an immoral, benevolent behavior towards oneself, others, and nature. Unjust suffering occurs in one’s life because of the following: human beings are sinners, a way for God to test whether one’s faith will change and because nature is unpredictable. This is proven in the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Job, and in the “Christianity” chapter of Roy Clouser, the author of The Myth of Religious Neutrality. There are several answers to the ways evil can be solved, but none is satisfying because evil is a tradition that has been in occurrence.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because of the experience itself that .we have been through, meaning that; we can’t have “hot” without “cold” So I understand that what we believe is evil is just the opposite end of the of good. I am often confronted with the argument saying that evil shouldn’t exist if God really existed. The “problem of evil” means that the existence of evil is a needed condition for the existence of certain kinds of good things. There are a number of characteristics that are important only if evil exists in this world. Being compassionate, for instance, is a great value, but can only exist if there is suffering in this world.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The topic in which I have selected is the TED talk given by Philip Zimbardo titled, ‘The Psychology of Evil’. I choose this topic because of my interest in criminal behavior and the psychology behind what makes a person commit crime. Zimbardo started by talking about his theory called the Lucifer effect, which is based around the idea that, “evil is the exercise of power” (Zimbardo, 2008). He then gives examples to explain what he means by this. Zimbardo also talked about Social psychologist’s theory and expands on it with his own knowledge to further backup what he was discussing.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Evil argument focuses on the fact the existence of evil in the universe contradicts with God’s existence. I challenge the soundness of the argument, especially two particular premises which deal with omnipotence and omnibenevolence. The argument is largely considered a valid or logical argument. To examine the validity of the argument, it is necessary, first, to define the term “God” in the argument.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An easily noticed problem with this argument is seen in premise 3. The problem is commonly seen as an argument over whether God is justified in creating evil, but instead it is about how God is not allowed to intervene and stop or create evil events. If God is all good then God would be separate from all evil; because God is separate from all evil if God was to intervene in evil events no matter how small this would mean that God is now involved in evil events. Because God is not involved with the events of evil in the world God is allowing evil to happen to shape humans moral urgency. So in the situation of evil events stopping, God would not interfere and create evil events to encourage moral urgency because God is totally separate from all evil.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One day, evil Aliens arrived on Mars from outside the Galaxy after receiving signals that there was life existed on the green planet. The battle began and the alien’s goal was to end the Green Legend species and destroy their culture and land. When they first attacked they used: Bombs, big robots holding laser weapons and giant spiders. They all came from a very large…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we choose the wrong from right, we are creating evil, but that's our choice. Just like Hick portrayed in his theodicy, when Adam sinned, he took his first step towards freedom. We enter this world undeveloped and through experience and hardships we will come to a self-realization. How would we learn from our mistakes if everything would go smoothly and there would be no wrong? An atheist would say that God could have made it that humans choose only the good, but we need variety in the world so that we can be able to differentiate.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many religions rely on this balance of good and evil such as Daoism and Buddhism. Free will certainly comes with its consequences, but only because we are morally aware do we recognize such juxtapositions. For example, there is a difference between existing as a sentient being as opposed to sentient being possessing free will. Humans know right and wrong when they act, i.e. they are morally aware and subjective sentient creatures. In contrast, a lion killing a zebra lacks this vital moral awareness.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brendan Hansen Mr. Williams Man’s Inhumanities 15 November 2017 The Science of Evil: Book Review INTRODUCTION: The book “The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Evil” by Simon Baron-Cohen was published recently in 2011 and provides and modern look on how we come about treating other human beings as objects. While this book was short coming in at around 250 pages, it still goes into much detail about how we come to commit cruel acts to other human beings. To summarize, Cohen argues that when we treat someone as an object, our empathy has been turned off, even going as far as making the argument that every cruel act is committed when an individual “turns off” their empathy, whether it be naturally or temporarily.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays