Today, the party loyalty is primarily based on ideological beliefs rather than identification of social groups. Abramowitz admits that such a situation can paralyze the democracy of the United States instead of the parliamentary democracies. He asserts that the legislative along with executive branches will be under the control of various political parties and this will make bipartisan cooperation not only unlikely but also damage politically, and this will give the remaining few moderates an outsized importance. The author supports his conclusions with charts and tables, and this makes his argument …show more content…
The electorate is more ideological and educated than ever before. The relationship between party identification and ideology has risen over the past four decades with the relationship being high in those that are politically involved. It is true that the involved voters matter more than the unengaged ones in elections. The population is becoming involved increasingly even in the public voting. The author argues that the growing consistency between and across issues positions as well as party identification has resulted in a polarization which he terms as being partisan-ideological (Abramowitz, 57). The American politics are driven by ideology, and it predicts partisanship better as compared to the social background. Both the candidates and voters are ideologically aligned. Abramowitz argues that those citizens who lack an ideological outlook that is consistent for whatever reasons are at a risk of becoming alienated increasingly from not only the electoral process but also the two primary political