Summary Of Mill's Considerations On Representative Democracy

Improved Essays
In Considerations on Representative Democracy Mill argues that a form of representative democracy is the best ideal form of government. It is not an invariant ideal that holds regardless of historical or social circumstances. But he does think that it is the best form of government for societies with sufficient resources, security, and culture of self-reliance. In particular, Mill thinks that representative democracy is best because it best satisfies two criteria of all good government: government is good insofar as it promotes the common good, where this is conceived of as promoting the moral, intellectual, and active traits of its citizens, and that government is good insofar as it makes effective use of institutions and the resources of its citizens to promote the common good (CRG 390, 392). Mill thinks that democracy plays an important epistemic role in identifying the common good. Proper deliberation about issues affecting the common good requires identifying how different policies would bear on the interests of affected parties and so requires the proper representation and articulation of the interests of citizens. But failure of imagination and the operation of personal bias present obstacles to the effective representation of the interests of others. Second, Mill thinks that democracy is also the best form of government …show more content…
His democratic faith was a matter of his conviction that ordinary citizens have an elemental humanity often missing in more educated or affluent groups. Dewey’s “democracy as a way of life” is a political ideal linked to both his communal notion of democracy and his view of liberalism. Beyond the school, where citizenship education begins, Dewey claims that individuals learn democratic habits when they associate and participate in political activities, which are not solely confined to political

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Carl Becker wrote about the “ideal democracy” in a government. The main purpose of his lecture is to make a clear understanding on the nature of democracy. He compares it with other forms of government that confide in a autocracy and the leadership of the few rather than the many. He states his concrete definition of democracy as, “A democratic government has always meant one in which the citizens, or a sufficient number of them to represent more or less effectively the common will, freely to act from time to time, and according to established forms, to appoint or recall the magistrates and to enact or revoke the laws by which the community is governed.” (Becker, 145)
 The Work of Carl Becker and his views on Ideal Democracy relates closely…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 5 Of Dahl Summary

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Modern representatives do not engage in war with one another because the basic principles of democracy also encompass peace to solve issues rather than fighting wars. The final point he brings to our attention is “Countries with democratic governments tend to be more prosperous than countries with nondemocratic governments.” (Dahl, Page 58) Market economies have generally produced more affluence, all countries with market economies were democratic by the end of the twentieth century. Democratic countries make education important, which is important for economic growth. An educated nation is more likely to be economically…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dewey, an American philosopher, georgist and educational reformer, explains in his book Liberalism and Social Action the importance of “effective liberty”, that being the function of social conditions existing at anytime. He explores the significance of this in relevance to the reconstruction of American Democracy, meaning that the government should be “by the people” not simply just “for the people”. He stated that early…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper Assignment Democracy is, obviously, one of the most commonly used concepts in modern society; but despite the frequent use, there is no universally agreed interpretation of the notion. The validity of this claim becomes particularly noticeable when comparing the interpretations of Thomas Jefferson and Carl Schmitt. This comparison is conducted with an aim to choose the most plausible approach to democracy which could be implemented in our contemporary U.S. society. It’s argued that although both Jefferson and Schmitt criticized their contemporaries for apathy in political participation, they suggested different ways through which Americans could contribute to building a democratic society.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This form of freedom in today’s America could not be achieved by many, and liberal politicians would not agree with Dewey’s standpoint. Dewey’s freedom can only be attainable by those who have the means to, a.) have all their means fulfilled and b.) be able to afford a good education to have the intelligence Dewey speaks so highly…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Utilitarian Perspective stated, “John Stuart Mill argued that individuals are, ultimately, the best…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    103). In order to achieve this, from the get go education and society should aim to, “establish in the mind of every individual an idissoluble association between his own happiness and the good of the whole” (Mill, pg. 108). This is quite the opposite of Locke, who argues government is formed by a people who give up some rights in order to protect their interest alone (Knoebel). To achieve Mill’s ideal requires a constant evaluation of government policies and procedures, as well as the political climate of the nation. For reasons to be explained accordingly, it should first be stated that President Obama’s executive order should be allowed to pass for the greater good of the nation and her citizens because the policies in place for immigration are not utilitarian at all.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He believes that tyranny of the majority may allow society to infringe on individual freedom will lead to conformity and oppresses and threatens an individual’s freedom, helping it to promote social censorship. For example, Mill stated that tyranny of the majority is more horrible than political oppression because it will affect and permeate people’s lives more, (Mill, Pg. 4) This shows that regular people such as family, friends, colleagues, and classmates will have more of a direct impact on an individual than people at the political or national level, showing that it is not the government or society that needs to be in check, but the other individuals or group of people that are harming the individual. Mill explains that people who wants freedom from social tyranny has to resist social conformity and moral behaviors that does not fit with their ideals, beliefs, or lifestyles, in which society at this point is a tyrant that enslaves the soul. Protection must be made on the basis of principle and can only stop if the individual do harm to society…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny of the majority is also a topic discussed throughout class thus far. In the tyranny of the majority, the government serves the people and majority rules. By having a majority rules system, the majority is prevented from being a dictator. Mill believes that you can never be sure you are preventing bad things from happening as you can never be sure that something will go wrong. He believes that the majority will not take away the rights of every one else if they are enlightened.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, both were advocates for individual freedom, and liberty through democracy. Mill and Tocqueville both feared tyranny, and promoted democracy so that citizens could have individual liberties, and thoughts. Mill’s ideal citizen in a democracy would be participatory, and opinionated in their beliefs. His citizen would not curtail any other citizen’s belief, no matter how far off of their beliefs it is. Tocqueville’s ideal citizen would be one who participates at a local level of politics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many individuals believe liberty is tied to democracy, and political choice is extremely important to Mill. Mill believes that the best form of government is Representative Government. In Representative Government, an individual has the ability to protect himself and his views. As Mill says, “Let a person have nothing to do for his country, and he will not care for it.” Meaning that if you do not let an individual have a choice, then he will have no motivation to be productive for society as a whole.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to guarantee the loyalty of its members, the law should also appropriately protect the individual freedom of its people. In regards to Mill, it appears that he somewhat agrees with Rousseau’s argument of the function of government. Mill argues for a representative democracy that would facilitate the development and evolution of liberty for its members. He believed that a representative democracy would only represent the interests of its people and would therefore lessen the resistance between the ruler and its people. Mill…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays