He wanted his perspective to prevail, so he chose his words in a way that the connotation would be very clear. The word slavery is not used once, instead, “the rights of person and property” is used. The North’s reaction to the secession was not an attempt to preserve the union, it was instead “an act of wanton aggression.” They are “entitled” to their rights, a call to military service is for the “purposes of defense,” and exploitative cotton business is simply the “export of a commodity required in every manufacturing country.” The entire justification for secession and war would fall apart without a morally righteous component, and Davis’s diction ensured that the justification would not fall apart under the stress of morally questionable
He wanted his perspective to prevail, so he chose his words in a way that the connotation would be very clear. The word slavery is not used once, instead, “the rights of person and property” is used. The North’s reaction to the secession was not an attempt to preserve the union, it was instead “an act of wanton aggression.” They are “entitled” to their rights, a call to military service is for the “purposes of defense,” and exploitative cotton business is simply the “export of a commodity required in every manufacturing country.” The entire justification for secession and war would fall apart without a morally righteous component, and Davis’s diction ensured that the justification would not fall apart under the stress of morally questionable