Summary Of Jan Narveson's Moral Matters

Decent Essays
Jan Narveson, a contract theorist who teaches philosophy at the university of Waterloo in Canada, writes in his book Moral Matters (1993) (side note: that was the year I was born! :)) Morals, if they are to be rational, must amount to agreements among people—people of all kinds, each pursuing his or her own interests, which are various and do not necessarily include much concern for others and their interests. But people have minds, and apply information gleaned from observing the world around them to the task of promoting their interests, and they have a broad repertoire of powers including some that can make them exceedingly dangerous, as well as other that can make them very helpful. (Rachels, 2010, p. 15)

Yes, the words that I am using

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract And Popular Sovereignty The social contracts stems from individuals coming together to form a sort of agreement to, which is central in making a society. Not only form a society but to make it a better place. Law, State and the constitution are all by-products of society; here we see the stepping-stone from people being people, to it becoming sovereign. All theories conclude that people make this social contract for protection of their being and also their property.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lamott puts into words what many of us already know, but often forget. In Looking Around when Lamott quotes her uncle Ben “and there it is--you recognize them[,]” (p. 98) that is what reading her work feels like. Her writing is all relatable, even if, like with the chapters Radio Station KFKD and Jealousy, it is not something I would like to dwell on. Honestly, I still only enjoy about half of Lamott’s writing. I found Radio Station KFKD could have been written in two paragraphs, and she took nearly six pages.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Your grandfather’s Alzheimer’s has progressed to such a degree that his mental capabilities are no more than those of a lab rat. Scientists are in need of test subjects, so your grandpa is shipped off to a facility where they test unregulated amounts of drugs, makeup, and shampoos on him. R. G. Frey uses this example of testing on cognitively impaired humans throughout his piece, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism.”. This paper will outline Frey’s arguments on why human life generally has more value than animal life and highlight the exceptions to the rule that justify the mentioned scenario, while also presenting objections to the unequal value thesis and evaluating those oppositions with respect to humans with cognitive disabilities…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates asks an interesting question which is; “[W]hy should we pay so much attention to what “most people” think?” -Socrates, In Plato's Crito (CA. 390 B.C.). Although, Socrates wasn't widely liked he debated long and deeply before ultimately making his decision to die or not. He believed that the state would be destroyed if people did not obey laws.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the family unit to the national state, each societal group is held accountable by the laws of their own creation. Whether through coercion or incentive, each member of the group agrees to abide by these laws. Yet were do these laws arise from? The answer is morals. Though some well-meaning idealists might wish for laws based on logic, it has been historically shown that many societies base their laws on a collective sense of morality.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay: Without morals, humanity as we know it will cease to exist, and without dignity, existence is pointless. Morality is defined by the principles and beliefs in right or wrong, instinctively engrained in humanity itself. Although morals vary from person to person, cultural groups and society, these basic principles generally remain the same. These principles include not murdering, stealing or slavery among several others. Every day these morals are broken, disregarded over peoples own selfish needs to benefit their own lives without thought for the lives of others.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I hope to argue that contractarianism is a very demanding moral theory because only by submitting to stringent requirements will a contractarian bargainer be able to gain any of the benefits the social contract is capable of giving. As I talk about contractarian beliefs and how it holds up as a moral theory, I do only address Hobbesian contractarianism, as opposed to other types of contractarianism. After providing a brief summary of contractarianism, I seek to argue that rules a contractarian bargainer would agree to would be rules that would result in them achieving their own best interests, so long as everyone else follows the same precedent. Contractarianism was created out of the belief that humans are, by nature, nasty. Hobbes outlined a “state of nature”, a life condition in which individuals are not limited by anything except their minds.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the course of history we have witnessed mutual benefits agreements between government and other members of society, these agreements are referred as social contracts. Social contracts protect people from abuse of power and violations of their basic rights. An example of a social contract is the agreement between the police force and civilians; we sacrifice our freedom for social protection. The aim of this paper is to analyze the positive and negative aspects of a social contract.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rights regulate what we as individuals can and cannot do, how we treat others, and how we expect others to treat us as well (Williams & Arrigo, 2012). This is very true in the sense, that we in American culture have many rights that may not be afforded in other cultures. There are rules, laws, and regulations that govern how one is to conduct themselves in society. Also, we have been reading throughout the weeks about acting in one’s self-interest. Additionally, rights factor in when determining what is morally required, permissible, or even forbidden (Williams & Arrigo, 2012).…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A trolley is moving down a track. The trolley can not be stopped, but it a nearby switch is able to move the trolley from one track to another. One track has five people, and the other has one. Flipping the nearby switch will cause the one person to die while leaving the switch alone will mean the five people will die. The question is: what would you do?…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As mankind and society have progressed over millennia, individuals have been searching for a true understanding of what is right and wrong as well as a proper way to live an ethical life. Through this curiosity many theories have been developed. However, is there unquestionably one certain theory and set of rules all of humanity should abide by? Though this question may continue to be up for debate, there are undoubtedly some theories that have respectable suggestions that attempt to give an answer. Among those many theories, a few that have developed are the consequentialist’s act utilitarianism, contractarianism, and the feminist’s, care ethics.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a state of nature, men are “Noble Savages.” His social contract theory states that humans are corrupted by society, all people must enter a social contract that requires people to recognize a collective “good will” which represents the common good or public interest. All citizens should participate and should be committed to the good of all, even if it is not in their personal best…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the world we live in now, almost everything is based on your social class and socioeconomic status. Whether it’s your salary, your friends, we could even go as far as saying it changes how other people view you as a person. All of this is based on morals. Morality is more important than money in society because, without morals, total chaos would occur. Though money is a huge part of everyday life and our system, for that matter, without morals, we won't be able to keep a functioning economic system at all because it would lead to corruption.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays