Summary Of George R. Boyer's Manifesto '

George R. Boyer described the “Manifesto” as a “…very much period piece, a document of what was called the “hungry” 1840’s” (Pg151). Boyer coveted to analyze the historical perspective of the book by summarizing the analysis of capitalist economic development. Marx and Engels arguments about the history of the Manifesto were found using data. Capitalism was a very strong objective of this book. The article was intended for the creation of different perspectives that the Manchester had in their economic, social and political conditions. Royer predictions were true that Marx and Engels were wrong about the collapse of capitalism. In the first section of the Manifesto, the authors presented a description of the development of industrial capitalism and others expectations of the future of
Vargas, Pg.5 capitalism (pg. 151-152). Class struggle will always exist in existing societies because they were only divided into two classes the Bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Furthermore, Capitalists (Bourgeoisie) are the dominant class, although, the proletariats were the subordinate class, the work for the upsurge of productions. …show more content…
The past 165 years there have been more stuff than even the middle class even dream of. After the American Revolution, the production of machinery, the creation on new cities and the world market made society what is today. Consequently, foreign-made products are been imported to U.S.A, but the exploitation that free labor is given to foreign countries is massive, work in exchange of wage, contracts and private properties. Acknowledging the argument of Boyer, the bourgeoisie society is destroying the unification of communities, as well as, the division of