Summary Of Framing The Constitution By Charles Beard

Improved Essays
This passage is called Framing the Constitution and was written by Charles A. Beard. Like Roche, the topic of this passage is the Founding Fathers that wrote the Constitution. The author’s purpose for writing this passage was to inform you on his viewpoint on the framers of the Constitution and maybe even persuade you to agree with him. Charles Beard’s thesis is that some of framers of the Constitution were just rich individuals that were trying to protect their own property and wealth. Beard believes that the framers protected against the majority just so they don’t get overthrown by them. He thought these “elite men” just wanted more power than the common man. The article wasn’t that convincing because I felt like Beard was just giving his

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Founding Fathers relationship between each other and the American People The founding fathers, if you grew up in America you likely have heard of them. Joseph J. Ellis’s book focuses on a few of the founding fathers lives and struggles. The first chapter, called The Duel, highlights the confrontation between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr which ended in Hamilton dying of a fatal wound. What happened is Burr, who was tired of Hamilton fiddling with his political career based off of their different political views.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sage Gurney Book Review: A More Perfect Constitution When I first realized A More Perfect Constitution by Larry J. Sabato was about rewriting the United States Constitution, I thought it was the last book I would want to read. I am glad I was required to read this book for a class, because I learned so much more than I thought I would. A More Perfect Constitution is a very well thought out and researched book.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention, one of the major issues facing the Framers involved the sharing of power between the state and national government. Even after having succeeded in becoming independent from Britain the colonists still viewed themselves as members of separate states. The Nation needed a strong centralized government that also protected the power of the states. Thus the Federalist American form of government was created.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John P. Roche gives his case that proposes that the form of the Constitution was simply a representative development involving a compromise of the interests of the state, economy, and governmental concentrations. In John P. Roche’s argument he states that the government was as democratic as possible: “My concern is with the further position that not only were they revolutionaries, but also they were democrats. Indeed, in my view, there is one fundamental truth about the Founding Fathers…: They were first and foremost superb democratic politicians…”[1]. He continues by stating that what they did was create a practical compromise that would support both the national interest and be something that the people would agree with. They started with the Virginia plan that proposed a bicameral legislative branch.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even at the author’s introduction, he juxtaposes “the Honorable George Mason/Mr. Gerry” to himself, a “Freeman of Connecticut”. Freeman depicts his lack of influence to relate to the citizens; his own essay is evidence of a regular man contending against all the opinions of the more intelligent. Emulating a citizen of the country, Freeman presents the fears of a republican government with questions such as whether the country will be “happy in a good or wretched in a bad form of government?”, and if all the greatness and freedom of America will be “squandered away?” All these concerns reiterate the thoughts of the citizens about the constitution and the potential new government, and they provide a sense of urgency for the citizens to take action. Freeman portrays himself as a model to persuade his audience to stop conforming to others’ opinions, so he can prevent ignorance being the cause of the constitution’s…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (3) The Federalist Papers were written by three of our founding fathers' named John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and James Jay. They are a collection of 85 newspaper articles which were written in a period between 1787 and 1788 to promote the constitution of the United States. Adams, Hamilton, and Jay were trying to alleviate the fears of anti-federalists by arguing the need for the states to give the federal government more power and to replace the Articles of the Confederation with the Constitution that was being discussed at the same time at the Philadelphia Convention. Some of the articles were written with the purpose of showing why the Constitution was needed, and others were written as counter arguments to opponents of the Constitution. The articles made it clear that the states would have their rights protected under the new Constitution rather than weaken them, all the while giving the government the ability to deal with federal debt and to make decisions on foreign policy.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5) The English magna Carta was created in 1215 to place limits on the power of the monarch. The law making body of England, Parliament, was depended on the King and Queen to pay for wars as well as the Royal Government. Similar to the deeds of the magna Carta colonial assemblies controlled their colonies funds and had some control over colonial governors. Another model for Americans was the English Bill of Rights taking place during 1689.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dara Lemberg Mr.Kriemer Government 11 October 2015 George Mason the Reluctant leader ‘‘Mr. Chairman, whether the Constitution is good or bad, the presented clause clearly discovers that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of control, must carry everything before it.’’…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A bicameral legislature is defined as one in which the legislators are divided into two separate assemblies, chambers or houses. This system is what we Americans use in order to create balance between the powers of its citizens, and it’s government. The Framers being our founding fathers, believed that we needed this system to help America not return to the same overpowering form of government that they left behind when they departed from the British. The Framers of the Constitution created a bicameral legislature as part of their efforts to create separation of powers and to more generally, make it harder for the government to do just about anything without its citizens at hand. Before the start of the American Revolution, the British levied…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tallmadge proposed something called the Tallmadge Amendment which is a bill to forbid the further introduction of slavery into Missouri and to request the Territory of Missouri to be admitted to the Union as a free state. It also states that he doesn’t support the abolition of slavery in Alabama because it was surrounded by slave holding states and with imaginary lines of division, free blacks and slaves mingling couldn’t be prevented and, could possibly start a war. Gentlemen disagreed with Tallmadge and, had “harsh expressions” about the whole thing, Tallmadge's amendment caused a horrible reaction from southern congressmen, mostly from Border States, such as Virginia, which looked to the new territories as a market for their dangerous surplus…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brutus Anti Federalism

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although the writers of the Brutus essays understood the importance of amending the Articles of Confederation, they nonetheless opposed the ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist, who wrote the “Brutus” essays in response to the Federalist Papers, were concerned about a powerful centralized government, individual rights and equal representation. In the first of the Brutus essays, the Anti-Federalist articulate their concerns about a strong federal government. The second of the Brutus essays advocates for a bill of rights, in order to ensure people’s individual rights. Lastly the Anti-Federalists wrote in the third of the Brutus essays about the issue of equal representation.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, a group of intelligent delegates, including Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and the like, came together to form the Constitution. Some people think that this famous document came out of greedy intentions. H. W. Brands, however, states in his piece that the founders were able to rise above shallow interests to form what remains the oldest written national constitution, which in turn created one of the most lucrative federal systems in history. He writes from the outlook of Benjamin Franklin, a seasoned and wise delegate of the time. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate and analyze H. W. Brands’ thesis in the article, Miracle at Philadelphia.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early days of American history, many of the founding fathers took precautions while writing the Constitution. The reasons these precautions were taken was so that the people of the United States wouldn’t be oppressed because of any amendments or rules. There were many opinions on why/why not the constitution should be supported. However, the Constitution was altered so that we would be truly and undeniably free from oppression. Federalists and anti-federalists have many good and acceptable reasons on their beliefs.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays