The father held the boy’s wrist. Also, the boy mentioned that his father’s hand holding his wrist was battered on one knuckle. In this line, one can interpret that the father could be abusive. In waltz, one does not hold the other person on the wrist but on the hand. In addition, the introduction of word “battered” could mean that the father might have punched something or someone causing a knuckle to bruise. And in this stanza, it was mentioned that the boy’s ear was scraped by a buckle every step his father missed. It could mean that the buckle that the author is suggesting was the buckle of a belt. It could also mean that the boy might be being hauled along, so every step the father makes, he gets hit by the belt’s
The father held the boy’s wrist. Also, the boy mentioned that his father’s hand holding his wrist was battered on one knuckle. In this line, one can interpret that the father could be abusive. In waltz, one does not hold the other person on the wrist but on the hand. In addition, the introduction of word “battered” could mean that the father might have punched something or someone causing a knuckle to bruise. And in this stanza, it was mentioned that the boy’s ear was scraped by a buckle every step his father missed. It could mean that the buckle that the author is suggesting was the buckle of a belt. It could also mean that the boy might be being hauled along, so every step the father makes, he gets hit by the belt’s