In Paine's Introduction he calls …show more content…
One of the first arguments against separation is that America thrives under Britain’s control, and in order to continue to do some a connection with Her is a necessity, Paine rebuttals back that this is completely “fallacious” and says that is basically the same as saying that “because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the next twenty” (Paine 642). He continues on by saying that “…America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power taken any notice of her.” (Paine …show more content…
who no had quarrel with us on any other account.” (Paine 643). Which is Paine’s way of saying that by staying affiliated with Great Britain, the American colonies will be inadvertently dragged into pointless wars, and have unnecessary enemies with nations. Another argument against our separation from Great Britain that Paine dismisses is about how the colonies supposedly have no other ties to other expect the mother country, thus making all the colonies “sister colonies” because of England (Paine 643). Paine rebuttals back that if Britain is the Mother country, then shame upon her. He goes on to say that the term mother country had been implemented by the King to play on the human psyche because naturally no one wants to fight with “family”. Eventually Paine switches from countering the reasons against the separation and starts proposing his own reasons for the immediate separation from Great Britain. Paine states that “The authority of Great Britain over this continent is a form of government which sooner or later must have an end” (643), because in his opinion he believes states that “this government (one ruled by England) is not sufficiently lasting to insure anything which we may bequeath to Posterity” (Paine