Chapter Nine: Are There Absolute Moral Rules?

Improved Essays
Ethics Response Paper
Chapter Nine: Are There Absolute Moral Rules?
In chapter nine of The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James and Stuart Rachels, the authors discuss Immanuel Kant’s moral theory and arguments on absolute moral rules. James and Stuart Rachels begin chapter nine with the story of Harry Truman and Elizabeth Anscombe. Anscombe views Truman as a murderer for ordering the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Kantian ethics consists of absolute rules independent of consequences. The Rachels point out that moral obligations, by contrast, do not depend on having particular desires, instead they are categorical; that is, having reason. Hypothetical imperatives tell us what to do provided that we have the relevant desires. Categorical
…show more content…
I recall back to seven years ago in secondary school. As a boarding school student at the time, I was governed by a set of rules which I had to abide by or face the consequences of going against the rules. Long story short, students were not allowed to be in possession of candy while on campus. I received permission to exit the school for health purposes, on my way out of school a good friend requested I buy her some candy to share on her upcoming birthday. I did just as she had requested but unfortunately for me, on entering the campus, the discipline master checked my bags and found the candy in there. Lo and behold, I told him the truth behind me being in possession of candy. He requested I write a report, in which I said exactly what I had told him before not minding the fact that my friend and I could be punished. Few days after I had submitted the report, the discipline master tempered justice with mercy, and my friend and I were free. Then, I thought to myself, "maybe if I had lied to the disciplinarian I would have been punished." I think Kant's idea of telling the truth regardless worked for me. Moreover, if we lied instead of saying the truth, there is no guarantee that lying would save both parties. In the Christian community, a saying goes like this, "the truth shall set you

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Name Institution Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Under the rule of President Truman, USA were ready to use an atomic bomb against Japan. Various options that were suggested to the president for retaliating against Japan, but he decided on the nuclear bomb that has not been in use for a period. Truman based his decision on the past phenomenon such as “the wake of the bloody battles on Iwo and Okinawa. “The essay focuses on the primary objective of the Harry S. Truman, which is dropping the atomic bomb on Japan about the moral dilemma that the president faced.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consider the following situations. In the first, you are an educator at the local university. You hear there is a crazed man demanding to see one of your students. Upon hiding the student in the room, you tell the man that the student did not attend class today and you don’t know where he is. Conversely, you work for a large company in New York, and it is your secretary is leaving in a few days for maternity leave.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the times, lying just seem like the easier way out. Theres no way possible that people can actually believe theres no-one out there that dosent tell a single lie. (160) "A man who won't lie to a women has very little consideration for her feelings" -Bergen Evans.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Moral Dilemma that Harry Truman Faced in Using Atomic Bomb on the Empire of Japan Introduction The ethicality of Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs on the Empire of Japan is questionable because there were alternative ways to end the war. The speed with which the second bombing occurred is also questionable, considering that it occurred only three days after the first bombing. Some analysts suggest that the emperor was not allowed ample time to analyze the impact of the atomic bomb. Truman defended his decisions suggesting that the enemies had tried to develop a similar bomb and would not have hesitated to use it.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lie is a lie, and therefore we should be telling the truth no matter if the outcome is wrong or not. Ericsson showed that and explained that by telling lies, your only hurting yourself and would eventually not know what is real or a lie after a while. Telling a lie may fix an issue for just a short while, and finally becomes a more significant situation then if you had only told the truth to begin…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the essay The Ways We Lie by Stephanie Ericsson, she mentions on how she discovered that telling the truth all the time is nearly impossible because it would be living with some serious consequences. Throughout the history of the United States and other parts of the world, a high percentage of people tend to not be able to tell the truth when they are asked simple questions by members of their family or by their close friends. As telling the truth may have consequences, telling lies may have deeper consequences that cannot only hurt the person telling the lie, but it can affect the person being lied to. Being known as a liar can cause problems in a relationship because it will bring on trust issues and can also cause one’s partner to overthink…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We may have a bad day or need to do a service better, and if we are continually lying to others, we cannot fix something. By continuously being lied to does not fix a situation, for example in a marriage if your spouse continues to lie over and over again to you and one day you learn the truth, you are more upset then if you had known the truth the…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper will discuss an ethical evaluation using Kantian’s theory in a lying case stated below. What is Kantian’s theory? Kantian’s theory is an ethical theory that relies on the moral goodness of all people. “Kant argued that there is an unconditional good related to rationality, the moral law, and moral duty. The theory is centered on the duty to act based upon respect for the moral law or legitimate moral rules (104).”…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays