In the novel, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, by Barbara Kingsolver, the reader is given the opportunity to view a modern family that is trying to salvage what was lost from “the family table”. During the 1940’s and 1950’s, many families would make dinnertime a priority each and every day. But, when the “liberation” of women arose, many families lost this crucial piece of their day because women were no longer “tied to the stove”. As a result of the women’s movement, “the family table” suffered from great losses, such as, adequate bonding, critical parenting, and a healthy lifestyle. The family that once was considered the “male breadwinner/female fulltime homemaker” (Cinotto, 29) form now drastically changed. For many families, dinner time
…show more content…
Kingsolver writes, “If I had to quantify it, I’d say 75 percent of my crucial parenting effort has taken place during or surrounding the time of our family convenes for our evening meal” (Kingsolver, 125). Children acquire many similar ideas and morals from their parents, especially over a meal conversation. Planned family meals provide an allotted amount of time for children to ask question and inquire about the surrounding world. This time also provides parents with an indirect way to teach their children right from wrong and give them personal insight. There are even surveys that tie a daily, sit- down family dinner to the successes of children in their later years (Kingsolver, 126). The liberation of women greatly affected the nurture and attention children received. Wolcott quotes Evelyn Peterson in a newspaper article explaining the benefits of family dinners, “A baby’s first social experience is to be brought to the table, where she sees people together and begins to feel part of a group” (Wolcott, 2). Many women attempt to juggle working and caring for their families, which proves “there is something valuable in a mother’s caring for her own child” (Lowry, 4) and her family as a whole. But, with the women’s movement not only were children affected, but marriages were significantly altered. Family unity and marriage were top …show more content…
In the 1950’s, some mothers had time to tend to gardens and shop for healthy options to present at the dinner table. Made-from-scratch food and family recipes were bountiful in the traditional household. In contrast, modern families choose fast food, frozen meals, and processed items to keep up with their busy schedules. Kingsolver explains that grabbing fast-food may save minutes, but it ultimately costs hours in the long run (Kingsolver, 130). Many children grow up thinking fresh produce and meats originate in grocery stores, when in reality, local farmers are providing all the labor. When the women’s movement took over, mothers did not have the time to shop for healthy foods, follow recipes, and tend to gardens. Dinnertime turned from a passing of food knowledge and traditional recipes to simply trying to save time. In the traditional family, “food is transformed in the domestic kitchen through a cultural operation (cooking), which requires time and effort” (Cinotto, 18). Yet, the modern family finds comfort in picking up take out or throwing frozen foods into the oven. This particular trend takes away a large part of “the family table”. Kingsolver’s daughter, Camille, also states, “The time we spend making dinner is hugely important because it gets us together after all our separate agendas, and when we sit down to eat we have a
Kingsolver writes, “If I had to quantify it, I’d say 75 percent of my crucial parenting effort has taken place during or surrounding the time of our family convenes for our evening meal” (Kingsolver, 125). Children acquire many similar ideas and morals from their parents, especially over a meal conversation. Planned family meals provide an allotted amount of time for children to ask question and inquire about the surrounding world. This time also provides parents with an indirect way to teach their children right from wrong and give them personal insight. There are even surveys that tie a daily, sit- down family dinner to the successes of children in their later years (Kingsolver, 126). The liberation of women greatly affected the nurture and attention children received. Wolcott quotes Evelyn Peterson in a newspaper article explaining the benefits of family dinners, “A baby’s first social experience is to be brought to the table, where she sees people together and begins to feel part of a group” (Wolcott, 2). Many women attempt to juggle working and caring for their families, which proves “there is something valuable in a mother’s caring for her own child” (Lowry, 4) and her family as a whole. But, with the women’s movement not only were children affected, but marriages were significantly altered. Family unity and marriage were top …show more content…
In the 1950’s, some mothers had time to tend to gardens and shop for healthy options to present at the dinner table. Made-from-scratch food and family recipes were bountiful in the traditional household. In contrast, modern families choose fast food, frozen meals, and processed items to keep up with their busy schedules. Kingsolver explains that grabbing fast-food may save minutes, but it ultimately costs hours in the long run (Kingsolver, 130). Many children grow up thinking fresh produce and meats originate in grocery stores, when in reality, local farmers are providing all the labor. When the women’s movement took over, mothers did not have the time to shop for healthy foods, follow recipes, and tend to gardens. Dinnertime turned from a passing of food knowledge and traditional recipes to simply trying to save time. In the traditional family, “food is transformed in the domestic kitchen through a cultural operation (cooking), which requires time and effort” (Cinotto, 18). Yet, the modern family finds comfort in picking up take out or throwing frozen foods into the oven. This particular trend takes away a large part of “the family table”. Kingsolver’s daughter, Camille, also states, “The time we spend making dinner is hugely important because it gets us together after all our separate agendas, and when we sit down to eat we have a