Summary Of Anselm's Ontological Argument

Improved Essays
Anselm’s ontological argument
The existence of the God have been a question probably for the whole history of humanity. There are a plenty of arguments for God’s existence, and in this paper I am going to review Anselm’s argument for the existence of the being nothing greater than which can be conceived, one of the strongest among others. At first, I am going to summarize the argument, and then, as every argument for the God’s existence has its own defects, I am going to answer the following question – what are the weaknesses of this argument? After that, I will respond to the strongest possible objection to my attack, and then give you a summary.
Anselm’s argument is based on the idea that God is the greatest conceivable being (a). We understand

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was Thomas Merton, a Catholic English writer who once said “To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that love is the reason for my existence, for God is love. Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name” (Merton).…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm is best known for the arguments he provided in regards to the existence of God. He especially contributed to what today is known as the “ontological argument”, or an argument about the state of existing or being. Anselm provides many reasonable arguments for the existence of God, and had an avid ability to explain reason behind it. Through Cur Deus Homo, he tries to rationalize God’s method for saving the world through Christ’s death as satisfaction, Anselm has been able to offer a significant view and meaning that many Christians today follow by providing a definition for the significance of Jesus’ death on the cross.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm's Three Proofs

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ANSELM: Like Augustine, Anselm used both faith and reason in his investigation for truth. In his view, Faith comes first but reason should follow, giving reasons for what human beings believe. Anselm’s monks asked him to write a model reflection on God in which everything would be proved by reason and nothing on the authority of Scripture. He replied with his “Monologion”. It contains three proofs of the existence of God, all of which are based on Neoplatonic thought.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that St. Anselm’s ontological argument is not adequate in proving the existence of God. First I will discuss his ambiguous use of the term “God”. Then, I will move on to analyze the term “greatest” made in his premises. Lastly, I will also criticize Anselm's argument by demonstrating that Anselm’s reply to Gaunilo’s objections are unconvincing. Anselm was the first one who developed the ontological argument, an argument for God’s existence based on reason, not on physical evidence.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, he defines an impossible being, which cannot exist in the understanding as a round square cannot exist in the understanding. In “An Analysis of the Ontological Argument, William Rowe wrote, “unlike the round square, God is a possible being.” (Rowe, p 106) In contrast, Anselm explains a merely possible being, a being that could have existed but does not, like a sibling that could have been born. The most important being Anselm mentions is the necessary being, which is a being that exists and could not have failed to exist.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gaunilo responds to the Ontological Argument by saying that the argument “proves too much”. By this, Gaunilo means that the Ontological Argument could be applied to anything, not just God; even things that we know do not exist. The example that Gaunilo uses is conceiving the most perfect island than which no greater island is possible. The most perfect island must exist in reality and in the mind, because if it did not, then it would be possible to conceive of an island greater than the most perfect island, that is one that actually exists. Therefore, Gaunilo is arguing that by using Anselm’s reasoning, it is better to exist (in the mind and reality) than to not exist, for if it did not exist, it would not be as perfect.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument v. Pascal’s Wager In this paper, I will be describing Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager and then contrast the differences between the two. These two arguments help to determine the existence of God. There are three norms of belief: ordinary belief, religious belief, and faith seeking understanding. The norms of ordinary belief are based on sufficient evidence to prove it is true.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2.2.8 Norman Malcolm Malcolm expanded on Anselm’s second argument, where most saw the second argument as a rephrasing of the first, Malcolm saw it as an entirely different argument. He believes that Anselm’s second argument is actually an argument that it is greater to exist necessarily rather than contingently, so it becomes a part of the concept that the greatest conceivable being would exist necessarily rather than contingently. This would free the argument from one of Kant’s critiques; the critique that existence isn’t a valid predicate, using this new argument, existence actually adds something to our concept of what God is rather than just being a statement on whether he exists. The crux of the argument is whether or not there exists a unique being that must exist necessarily rather than contingently, everything we know is contingent on something else, for example, you are contingent on your parents.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will discuss how Anselm specifies God in a vague manner making it difficult to understand, at first, what he is talking about. Also, I will discuss whether or not it is possible for there to be something that is greater than God himself. In Anselm’s text, “On the Ontological Argument,” he starts by saying that something than which nothing greater can be thought could be an idea or an understanding. He explains how something than which nothing greater can be thought “cannot be nonexistent even in thought.” (132).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Anselm creates the Ontological argument with one primary goal. He claims to succeed in developing an argument of the existence of God without the requirement of actual proof. Anselm 's reasoning and argument only gives a mere opinion on the topic of the existence of God. He formulates a two part hypothesis consisting of: God exists and God has always existed. Anselm’s Ontological argument expresses accusations that are simply in his favor or his outlook on God.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why he starts his argument with the view of the fool; which strengthens his argument. This works well, because we too may question if what we understand is true in reality as well. He takes the part of the fool only believing that God exists in conception, and uses it as the starting point of the proof of God. At first when I recognized the contradiction in Anselm’s writing, I was confused, but as I contemplated his words, his use of a reduction really works for me.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will dispute that Anselm’s ontological argument is dependent on Anselm’s personal faith in God. My argument lies within the premises that Anselm offers, it would not be rationally acceptable to create content of a maximally perfect being unless the person already accepted the Christian faith. The premises for Anselm’s argument can only be held if the only conception of non greater (relative to his attributes and worldly design) is God but if one does not follow such religious paths how can it be god. So in a sense god wouldn’t exists since you can’t have a mere conception of god without prior experience or impression of him. I will engage this scope of criticism by touching on Humean concepts and conveying how Anselm faith structured…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays