Summary Of Animal Rights By Tracy Reiman

Improved Essays
"Tracy Reiman, an executive vice president for PETA discusses animal rights and the treatment of animals during a time of racism published in the Tribune News Service. Reiman argues that while we have progressed as a more humane society, our treatment towards animals should improve and believes that the best time to address these issues is nowas it goes hand in hand with other issues such as discrimination and wants to include species into the line of inclusivity to augment its meaning. While I agree with what she’s fighting for, specific sections in Reiman’s article made me question her argument.
In paragraph 14, Reiman emphasizes her points by comparing the issue of animal rights and how we treat them to key events from the past giving a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the editorial “A Change of Heart about Animals,” you claim that animals are more like humans than we thought. These claims are supported by first providing credible sources, then offering experiments done, and finally presenting animal behavior observations. It seems that your purpose is to promote animals rights in order to have animals treated more humanely. The article is written in casual tone for the readers of the L.A Times which are: millennials, Hispanics and affluent individuals of the entertainment industry.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine life without depending on any animals. For some it may be easy for instance a vegetarian but hard for the meat lovers. Animals do much more than just feeding us. They can find cures for diseases like cancer and AIDS. In the essay “The Evil of Animal Rights,” there is a group of people who disagree with animal testing.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals should be treated humanely because, according to science, the differences between animals and humans are less than what we think. He believes that animals should be given the rights that protect them from inhumane treatment and human consumption. He is telling us that we have to give them the same rights that a human possesses. In affirmation to Jeremy Rifkin, we should treat animals humanely because they also have a heart that can feel pain and a brain that can think.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer’s argument for lobbying against animal cruelty is highly respected and is used for most scholarly debates. His published book, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, is widely considered within the animal liberation movement to be the founding philosophical statement of its ideas. Many, however, do not agree with Singer’s argument that nonhuman animal suffering should be taken into consideration when compared to human suffering. Their argument is mainly that animals do not have feelings, nor do their lives compare to that of humans. One of their biggest arguments is wildlife refuges, where hunters are allowed to “harvest”, or kill, excess population to prevent overpopulation of animals.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Animal's Place All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal. Equality is one point Pollan shares with his readers, stating that there is not much equality among animals themselves.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would be great if PETA wasn’t as twisted as it is. Patty Stran, president of the National Animal Interest Alliance states that “The Animal Rights Movement is moving in an altogether different direction from what the American public…

    • 2374 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Singer had called for a “fundamental change in the human-animal relationship. [He] argued that animals are victimized by humans on a massive scale...for the belief that the human species is superior to all others” (“The History of Human Animal Interaction” 18). The release of Singer’s book caused people to think about the treatment that was given to animals; however, many people thought that the idea that animals could not be used by humans for any purpose was too extreme. While many people did not support the ideas brought up in the book, it started an interest in the topic with people in the years following publishing more books surrounding animal rights. Five years after Singer’s book was published the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) was formed.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Name: Georges Maljian Topic: Animal Rights General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience should acquire a better understanding of why animals should have rights and treat them the same way they treat one another. Thesis: Sharing most of the same feelings and emotions we do, animals are not ours to use for entertainment, eat, experiment on, wear, or abuse in any other way. Introduction:…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Case For Animal Rights

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Animals are a vital part of our society, we keep them as pets, as service animals, Illicit-substance detection dogs, police K-9’s, and perhaps most disputedly; farm animals. The question of whether or not animals have rights is an issue that has been heavily debated recently but has been considered for a long time. The issue seems gain popularity at every turn. In taking a closer look at the issue of whether or not animals have rights, we will be able to answer the question of whether or not it is morally acceptable to use animals in the way we do now. I would also like to begin by pointing out that I am someone who identifies as an “animals lover” but do not agree that it is morally unacceptable to use animals for vital purposes such as food,…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays