Summary Of A Discourse On Inequality

Improved Essays
A Discourse on Inequality, published in 1755 by Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an essay submitted into a competition out of hundreds of competitors that also applied happened to win. This discourse exceptional read about inequality before and after man meant society. Equality was an important and essential aspect of life, as it proceed to seem unchangeable and then meeting miraculous change. Rousseau did a proficient job explaining the various steps of how man came to be unequal from a state of equality. Through reading this discourse, I became intrigued with the normal everyday “savage man” having barely any needs and maintaining forever happiness to suddenly reaching the quality of perfectibility in a more “civil man” meeting society. Men is equal as a savage man with nobody around except himself. Savage man was not afraid of death but afraid of pain because man had not had an encounter with a death, therefore there was no idea. What he had not known, not seen, or not experienced did not hurt him because there was no society around to learn from. The quality of perfectibility …show more content…
Such as who is stronger then one another and who can sustain more pain, but that soon changed quickly as that was not a big deal. The beginning of moral inequality is the realization of property. Property allows man to start seeing the wide margin of difference between one another, who is poor and can’t afford as much and who is rich that can own more property. As Rousseau explains this is where the quality of perfectibility takes place. These man that now have reached a civil society are now in competition and can see there is always going to be someone higher up the ladder then them. This establishes new social classes and civil man now has a reason to have enemies. In the end however, political power turns around and enslaves all (rich and poor) and this is where Rousseau predicts, “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an English Philosopher whose work was influential especially in the eighteenth century. Some of his main works include the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, and the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Both of these works were written in response to prompts from the Academy of Dijon. For the first discourse, the prompt was, “Has the restoration of the sciences and arts tended to purify morals?” and for the second discourse the prompt was, "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by the natural law?"…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a publication, Kevin Leicht (an authority in the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign’s sociology department) says that America is focusing too much around the earnings gap between white and black workers, and doesn’t focus enough on the disparities within them. His writing was published in the Sociological Quarterly and delves deeper into the arguments surrounding income inequality and how America is distracted from finding practical solutions. Currently, it has been reported that no one is doing something about the fact that economic inequality has increased compared to the previous decades, as told by The Atlantic. Leicht goes on to say that America is having the wrong conversations about income inequality.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because it is believed natural man is to be like this by Rousseau, inequality isn’t prominent in nature. In the other half, Rousseau criticizes the inequality of property -- how work and oppression divides people into property. He also describes the development of technology and how it influences people’s virtues. The property class and the struggle of poor vs. rich led to the idea of a contract to solve the inequality issue. “But according to Rousseau, it is a liability: “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains.””…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The idea of social inequality as positive is that it is helping the society as a whole. But the idea of social inequality as negative is because the government is giving money and resources to people in need but it is not to everyone. This seems unfair to some people in society because they work hard to take care of their families. But, on the other hand there is families that have fallen on hard times and really do need the extra help to have a better chance of being in control of their…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Gary S. Becker’s and Kevin Murphy’s article, “The Upside of Inequality”, they argue that the increase of the income inequality gap is beneficial to our economy because of the reason behind it; now that more people are investing in their “human capital” by pursuing higher education, the higher rewards from this is the cause of inequality. They elaborate on how the rise is due to the fact that education is emphasized in the labor market, such that more people who are investing in education have higher rewards. The income gap is growing because of the increasing opportunities to advance. Becker explains that the potential of advancement through education is higher than ever, it has especially beneficial for people of color and women. With…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Rousseau mentions that men are to be slaves to their masters, he implies that men ought to live free. He suggests that men will become captive to their masters and remain as slaves. They will have their liberty until they obey, and after they escape from slavery. Every individual wants to do with their life what they please. No one will ever be free because there is always a person that judges or wants to manipulate an individual.…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The essay will conclude that society is both progressive in one sense and yet corrupting in another sense depending upon the extent to which it fosters the positive values of community, and the extent to which it may degenerate if these values are not developed properly. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM, ANOMIE AND ALTRUISM. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM Rousseau’s Social Contract (1762) presents a view of society as corrupting, by describing the ways in which the transition from living freely, to living enslaved by the rules of society decays the virtue of man. Before there was civilisation, people lived peaceful and innocent lives, in which they strove to sustain their own contentment and absolute freedom. In the ‘state of nature’, man was free to do as he wished,…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparative Essay of “Confronting Inequality” and “The Upside of Income Inequality” “30% BONUS-ANALYSIS #2” Inequality is a problem that affects the entire world. This issue involves people of all age, race, gender, and class. A few authors I have read who reflected on this issue are, Paul Krugman, Gary Becker and Kevin Murphy. Krugman’s article, “Confronting Inequality”, argues why and how there is problem with large differences between wages of the poor and wealthy. Becker and Murphy’s article, “The Upside of Income Inequality”, argues the importance of education, and how college gives us the skills and knowledge we need to earn a high income.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut is the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities start to form. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as they begin to compare their strengths and abilities of others. Although Rousseau argues that the invention of private property is not natural, it is inevitable as it becomes a necessity due to certain circumstances such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between the wealthy versus the poor and played a significant role in the creation of…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that humans are born innocent but are later corrupted by society. “Although, in this state, he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature, he gains in return others so great” (Rousseau). Rousseau believes that men are born equal but through the influence of society men “deprives himself of some advantages” that they are born with. Rousseau uses the words such as “advantages” to inform the reader about the features that mankind is born with but society removes it. The tone Rousseau uses is pro mankind but only to an extent.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays