Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion By Judith Thomson

Superior Essays
Judith Thomson, in “A Defense of Abortion”, argues her thoughts towards abortion, by using forms of analogies and acknowledges the right to life a fetus has, but also argues that the unborn baby’s right to life does not over ride the pregnant women’s right to make choices and have control over her body. There will be analogy examples in which there are different stated scenarios of a pregnant woman where you will find yourself comparing the scene to an analogy. In order, to justify whether an abortion can be performed or not under certain exceptions varying on the conditions. Thompson’s arguments about abortion deal with the status of being a person of the fetus and, in addition, those who oppose towards abortion spend most of their time trying …show more content…
Imagine, one day you wake up on a bed in the hospital attached to cables and IV tubes connected to you and joined with a violinist. The violinist is suffering from a loss of blood and that is what you are transferring to him in order for him to keep him alive. The doctor mention there is no blame on the violinist, the doctor, and you; the ones who committed the kidnapping were the Society of Music Lover’s who hooked you up. You must be hooked up to him for nine months because you are the only cure that is keeping the violinist alive at the moment and if you disconnect yourself from him then you will end up killing him. In this case, your right to life towards your body is much less than his. In this example, it is meant to understand the view point of an abortion in a different stage setting. It represents a woman who was raped and had an outcome of an unplanned pregnancy, which the violinist is viewed as the fetus and the pregnant woman is the kidnapped person that didn’t volunteer to be attached to the violinist. It was not under her consent and was forcefully hooked up to him. In other words, you can see it in the manner of the pregnant women being attached to the fetus when in reality she did not plan to be pregnant; it was the result of the …show more content…
With this given, I would strongly support a woman’s right to do an abortion under certain circumstance of rape or unplanned pregnancy. Although it is mentioned that, “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life.” (Thomson, J.), it cannot be morally wrong to commit murder towards the fetus if the mother is doing an act of self defense in this case to save her own life. Thomson states that a fetus has a right to life at the moment of conception (Thomson, J.) but thoroughly explains how the fetus cannot overweigh the pregnant woman’s right of life so therefore, it does not begin at the moment of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Thomson makes a variety of arguments during Defense of Abortion that mostly combat the view that all abortion is morally impermissible. She believes that in most cases people decisions of whether abortion is morally permissible versus impermissible is dependent on whether a person believes that an embryo is a person. This suggests that since the embryo is a person then…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life. For the sake of argumentation, Judith assumes that a fetus is a person. However, instead of automatically…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This type of pregnancy is that where the mother has become pregnant through the means of getting raped, and therefore in the case where the mother has not given the fetus a right to the use of her body. Thomson says that terminating this pregnancy is considered morally permissible due to that fact. Thomson also presents thought experiments that help support her conclusion. One thought experiment that supports this is the one of the violinist, in the case where you were kidnapped and hooked up to him without your permission. This case is related to rape in that in both cases your permission was not taken into consideration. They are also similar because it would not be considered unjust on your part to disconnect yourself from the violinist or abort the fetus, in other words to refuse the use of your body as their means of survival without your explicit…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A mother does not have many options when it comes to giving herself an abortion so we have to look at what a third party can do. Thompson asks us to imagine being in a very tiny house with a rapidly growing child. As the child begins to grow you smoosh closer and closer against the wall until you are finally crushed to death, whereas the child will be fine. Both you and the child are innocent and the child is unintentionally causing you harm. Now, this is what makes it hard for a bystander to help because they are unable to choose between your life and the child’s life. But it is not said that you cannot do anything to save yourself. No matter how innocent the child is, you do not have to stand by while the child crushes you to death. Thompson relates the house to a mother’s body, to which we do not allow the right of self-defense. But if the woman is housing the unborn child then it should be remembered that it is her…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is often a large dispute over abortion and when personhood begins. Some believe it is at fertilization, some think that it is a vague concept, and some believe that it is when the child is born. The common argument against abortion is the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. A philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, believes that even if personhood begins at the stage of being a fetus, there are still times when it is moral to abort the fetus. She believes that personhood begins at a vague time, however she wants to prove even if the fetus is a person, she can provide times when it is still morally permissible to have an abortion. Therefore, she grants the opposing side that the fetus is a person.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The newly fertilized ovum is no more a person than an acorn is an oak tree. Suppose we assume, just for the sake of argument, that the fetus is a person with the right to life from the moment of conception. It does not follow; she argues that abortion is never justified. She appeals to a series of imaginary cases, such as being kidnapped and plugged into a famous violinist, being trapped in a tiny house with a growing child, and having people seeds growing in your carpet. Reflection on these cases shows that the right to life is only the right not to be killed unjustly; it does not entail the right to use your body or to live in your house. These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy. Also, there are some cases in that perhaps an abortion would be better for the fetus because the pregnancy was not on purpose, and once it is born, it cannot be given the best…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They are told if they disconnect themselves the violinist will die. Thompson states that if you were unwillingly put in this situation, then most people would unplug themselves since they were not given a choice and they have a right to decide what happens to their body. In the case of life endangerment, Thompson gives a scenario in which the audience is in a very small house with a rapidly growing baby. If the baby is allowed to continue to grow, it will crush the reader. She believes that most people would kill the baby to save themselves in self-defense. Since self-defense is considered morally permissible, then abortion due to life endangerment is also morally permissible. In the case of third party intervention in an abortion, Thompson gives another scenario in which two people are fighting over a coat that would save their life. She first states that if the reader did not know then it is not their right to choose who gets the coat. Later, she states that if it belongs to one of the two people, then the reader has a right to help that person remain possession of the coat. Thompson makes a distinction here though. She states that the reader has the right to help in the second situation, but it is does mean that the reader must act. In the final case, unintentional pregnancy due to failed contraceptive, Thompson’s must first establish three things.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar. “Performing the abortion would be directly killing the child, whereas doing nothing would not be killing the mother, but letting her die.” The conclusion that is drawn from this scenario is that your own right to life gives you the moral right to “unplug” yourself if your life is threatened. Equally, if there is a risk of the mother dying, she has a right to end the pregnancy in order to save herself. It cannot be considered murder to kill someone in order to save yourself. This analogy shows the extreme view to be false. To further weaken the extreme view, Thomson addresses the argument against third parties. She believes that, just a like a woman having the right to choose to save her life, a third party should be able to choose if he/she want to…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘’It is just a blob of tissue, not a baby” (“Pro Life Vs Pro Choice: An Introduction to the Debate’’). Because most abortions are done with in the first trimester or slightly after, it is hard to consider it as killing a living, breathing human being. ‘’Personhood begins after a fetus is able to survive outside of the womb or after birth, not at conception’’ (“Should Abortion Be Legal?”). Out of the seven characteristics of life, five cannot be demonstrated by a fetus within the first trimester if it was to be removed from the womb of the mother. These characterizes of life are as follows: all living things grow, all living things reproduce, all living things have the ability to adapt to their environments, all living things use energy, and all living things have the ability to respond to different stimuli introduced into their environment (“The seven characteristics of life”). If a fetus is removed from the womb, it is cut off from all nutrition or energy that it receives from its mother. Without nutrition, it can no longer thrive, grow, or develop on its own and the only response to any stimuli presented is death. Most abortions save women from gruesome psychological effects due to rape or incest. Forcing a woman to carry and give birth to a child without her consent is bound to cause more psychological harm than the abortion itself (“10 Arguments: For and Against Abortion”). In most fetus fatal abnormalities such as a missing limb can be detected which can result in death shortly before or after the baby is born. Even for those abnormalities that are nonfatal, most mothers are not financially stable to take care of a disabled child and abortions are their best option ("Should Abortion Be…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first will be the violinist and other person, and her text, the pronoun “you” is representing the mother, the violinist is the fetus, and unplugging is the act of abortion. Per the textbook, “Everyone has a right to life, so the unborn person has a right to life” (Page.178). The analogy involves a third party telling you that it if you don’t stay connected to the famous violinist’s kidneys, then he will die. They tell you, “yes, we kidnapped you, but your kidneys need to stay connected to the violinist for him to live.” It is up to you to stay connected and help the violinist survive, or you can say, “nope, unplug me.” Thompson makes clear that you are not facing danger, but the musician is. It also made clear that you can choose to stay plugged in, and that it is a supererogatory act in doing so. From a utilitarian perspective, the staying connected can be an appropriate act, because it is for the greater good, all the while keeping the violinist’s life in mind. The act would be described as: It is being done for the greater good, because if I do unplug myself then I am not a good person. I am giving life to a person thus I am a good person. Also, him being a famous violinist he will be able to provide comfort by using his music and his talent for other people. Likewise, would be described for the mother, fetus, and abortion. If the mother lets the fetus live in her body, then she is doing it for the greater good of the fetus. If the fetus is aborted, then it is committing an act of greater good for the mother. This metaphor is an example of when abortion is permissible. To continue, another permissible example would be the people seeds correspondence. In this analogy, the seed is conception (egg), the mesh screen is contraception or protection, and the open window is the act of having sex, regardless of knowing the consequences. The living place or in…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson and Hursthouse both have come to the conclusion that abortion is impermissible but there are acceptable situations in which abortion should be permitted. In my opinion I agree with both Thomson and Hursthouse but in the end the conclusion of Hursthouse is the view I could see making both sides of abortion acceptable. When a woman and man conceive a baby knowingly, getting an abortion will only occur in the event of a health risk or the chances of the baby living after birth will be so minimum. By choosing abortion before letting the child get to full term is less painful than carrying the baby to full term and giving themselves false hope. It is understandable that some may want to fight for that chance but there is the option of abortion. Thomson also says that allowing someone to use your body is different from them having the right to. When the violinist was attached to her she never gave him the right to use her body but say may see it as a moral obligation to allow him to use her body. For anyone to see what that truly feels like they would need to be put in that situation but overall it would be an internal conflict between morally doing what is right and what you would want for yourself. It would either be you choosing the “right” thing to do or everyone being mad at you for choosing what is best for you and your baby, or in that case what is right for the violinist. In the…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, most women in general did not want the baby to begin with. Like I had said, they took precautions by using some form of birth control in order to have a high chance of not getting pregnant. Even with the use of some form of birth control, they are sometimes defective and the woman may still end up pregnant. As to the objection that abortion is killing and thus morally wrong, I say that not all killings are morally wrong. For example, self-defense is justifiable as a means to defend yourself (191). The unwelcomed fetus has invaded the woman’s body and is “stealing” in a sense that it is taking nutrients from your body without consent (195). With this, it should not be declared morally wrong to have an…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The abortion dispute inquires whether it should be ethically permissible to terminate a pregnancy before traditional delivery. Multitudes of people in our society today have made the decision to end their pregnancy due to very logical personal reasons. I believe that in certain circumstances, abortion is an optimistic option. While many people believe that abortion is a sin, I choose to have an open mind on the idea that abortion is sometimes the only option for many people. In cases of rape, lack of sex education and abuse, abortion should be legal in efforts to give these people a chance for their future. People should take in consideration the circumstances and…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics