On Chapter 3 it stated, “Poor white farmers enjoyed the privileges of free status. They could get married, have families and bequeath their property and their freedom to their descendants… These privileges of freedom - none of them possessed by the slaves – made lesser white folk feel they had a genuine stake in the existence of slavery, even if they did not own a single slave.” Does this mean the slaves are somewhat free? Did these “paternalistic” views of white men set one of the foundations to slaves in the South to long for freedom? There is no doubt that these speculations has captured my attention and would a great
On Chapter 3 it stated, “Poor white farmers enjoyed the privileges of free status. They could get married, have families and bequeath their property and their freedom to their descendants… These privileges of freedom - none of them possessed by the slaves – made lesser white folk feel they had a genuine stake in the existence of slavery, even if they did not own a single slave.” Does this mean the slaves are somewhat free? Did these “paternalistic” views of white men set one of the foundations to slaves in the South to long for freedom? There is no doubt that these speculations has captured my attention and would a great