Ethical Egoism In Don T Help Me

Improved Essays
Ethical egoism states that one should do things that benefit in their own interest. Some key features of ethical egoism are ethical subjectivism, Naïve Ethical egoism, and enlightened ethical egoism. This theory claims that we should act from self-love. However, Egoists have different views about what is good for the individual depending on the situation. In “Don’t Help Me” Kevin is confused about what steps he should take to help his friend, so I am going to advise him based on ethical egoism perspective. I would advise a person representing ethical egoism that Kevin should call for help. He should call for ambulance even though it may risk Tom’s scholarship. They should advise this because egoists are only worried about what is beneficial for them and in the best interest of them only. If Kevin does not call and wait for Tom to …show more content…
This theory can help Kevin establish his personal identity at an early stage of his life. It can also help with self-preservation which means that person would not take action that would put themselves in harm’s way. Some people would not like other people minding their business so this way an egoist would only worry about himself rather than what is in best interest of others. For instance, being selfish can be seen as bad thing but it is necessary to gain self-confidence and self-love even though it is not best for others interest. Ayn Rand defines selfishness as someone who is concerned about their own interest which opposite to altruism is enabling people to feel guilty later on. She claims that people should not have to do things for others and gain happiness. They should focus on themselves and do things that make themselves happy so that way they can gain self-respect for making the right decision. So, if Kevin calls Ambulance he should not have to feel guilty later on for putting Tom’s future at risk. Instead, He would gain self-confidence for doing what he thought was best for

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am not one to usually agree that lying is ok but would have to agree that this situation would justify doing so. The utilitarian theory is focused on the overall outcome of the group vs the ethical theory being focused on the outcome of the individual so I would have to stand behind utilitarianism on this situation. The Utilitarian ethic seems more compelling and correct, in my opinion. I see utilitarianism as more of the maximize happiness and minimize suffering but don’t do so in a way that negatively affects someone else if you can prevent it, theory. Utilitarianism looks at everyone, not just yourself.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Particularism Vs Pluralism

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of doing this, we pass judgment from the privacy of our own minds and condemn acts that we see as “immoral”. This is due to the idea that man-made moral guidelines on which to live a good life, is embedded in our psyche and we use them to live our everyday lives. However, we can argue that the embodiment of the “moral person” living based on moral guidelines is fundamentally idealistic. No one can be perfectly moral, and I believe that living a life based on multiple, conflicting moral principles does not increase the greater good of a person. Rather, what it does is confuse people about their morality during a particular act.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like previously mentioned, according to Thomas’s highly moralized view, friendship is valuable for the reasons that moral learning should come from it, and that friends should be a moral example for another. His reasoning for this comes from him saying that in a true friendship you are very close with your friend, and you would want them to be moral. Because of this., friends should not accept each other’s moral flaws, but should help them become morally better instead. People should also not support their friends in immoral endeavors. Cocking and Kennett disagree with them by saying that friendship is something that can lead us morally astray for its own sake and that it has little, if anything, to do with morality at all.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant has an interesting approach to ethics, one that many people would agree with. Contrary to Aristotle, Kant believes ethics should be based on good will. Meaning, we should look at moral actions not by finding the good in the action, but doing the action with goodness. He explains how this can be done with his categorical imperative and the two formulations of it. These formulations help us decide whether or not our actions are based off of goodwill or our own inclinations.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Introduction on Ethical Egoism: A rear assumption is that the needs and happiness of other people will always effects on our moral ethics. If we accept this assumption, we think that our moral ethics are balancing our self-interest against that of others. It is true, that “What is morally right or wrong depends not only on how it makes us feel, but also how it affects others”. The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard Work Research Paper

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    We are all responsible for our own destinies and should not let others determine our course in life. Contrary to popular belief, it is possible to be too optimistic. Optimism is important when it creates a sense of possibility that leads you to act, but it is destructive when it leads to the conclusion that things will work out the way they were meant to no matter what. Being optimistic about a situation will inspire you to take action, but being optimistic to a point that you believe action is unnecessary is only hurting yourself. Convincing yourself that everything will work out may alleviate stress, however, it takes away your freedom to act upon your circumstances.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are more cases regarding those whose desires do not coincide with their self-interest and these contradict the theory of psychological egoism. In cases where a psychological egoists would claim that everyone would expect even just a little bit of benefit, does not take into account pessimistic people or people who know that the action will not benefit them at all (Shafer-Landau, 2015). Using sincere love as an example, the claim that our actions are motivated our strongest desire would not hold up because our self-interested desires would not be our priority; rather, you would want the other person to be happy even if it caused you pain (Jorati, 2014). There are times that people go after their own self-interest, however if they did it all the time, there would be no sense of morality. Even Shafer Landau (2015) states “If all we can do is look out for Number One, then there is little point in demanding we do otherwise.” (pg.104).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theme Of Sin In Life

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Sin also establishes a selfish view of living a good life. This creates a focus on good deeds being beneficial for the individual instead of for others, because the threat of Hell and eternal punishment is an individual fear. One person could avoid sin and secure a happy afterlife for themselves but this causes them to live life selfishly, focused on their own future outcome instead of doing things for the good of other people in the present. A greater sense of virtue, both individually and as a whole could be achieved with a more secular view morality. People should be more focused on living and being an admirable person during life rather than getting distracted by how…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peer Pressure Speech

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Maybe because; They may be trying to make you feel small, so that he/she can feel better about themself. You don't need their approval to feel good about yourself. They may be afraid of anyone who is different from them. You can listen to what that person has to say, but that doesn't mean you have to agree with them. They could be afraid of criticism, so they will do the criticizing first.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays