Essay about Stricter Gun Control Should Not Be Canada Safer

1685 Words Mar 8th, 2016 7 Pages
As John Stuart Mill said, “The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is hearing what can be said about it by every variety of opinion and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind”. The questionable subject of whether strict gun control will increase Canada’s safety has been highly considered, and argued by many. Varying opinions examine this topic in depth, however, this essay is aimed at establishing the ways in which stricter gun control will not make Canada safer. Those who argue that gun control should not become stricter include hunters, target shooters, and gun collectors, claiming they should be allowed to pursue their hobbies. Many others also feel that owning a gun gives them the means to protect themselves, and ensures their safety. However, as for those who are opposing this, it is a quite obvious fact that strict gun laws will make it less difficult to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, as well as reduce reckless gun fights among citizens. It is in the best interest of the citizens of Canada to propose their own position, only to ensure that Canadians feel they are safe and secure, and guarantee section 7 of the Charter, the right to life, liberty and security of the person. This being said, it is most rational to permit that stricter gun control will not make Canada a safer place.
While deciding whether or not gun control should become more strict, it is essential to…

Related Documents