The Importance Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Improved Essays
Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Shooting a gun does not simply happen by itself, but the person behind the gun pulling the trigger. By regulating gun laws, we may say that by having stricter gun control, it will be difficult for criminals to get a hold of a gun, but it does not mean that there will be less crime or fewer deaths. Criminals do not follow the law regardless, so what makes everyone think that by having gun control, or by regulating gun laws that it will change the way things are. Therefore, there should not be stricter gun control laws in the United States. Having more gun control laws will reduce gun deaths. In the United States guns were leading deaths by homicide (66.6% of all homicides) and by suicide (52.2% of …show more content…
The second amendment of the United States says, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.’’ Owning a gun in America is an old tradition, older than the country itself. By adding more gun control laws it would mean my rights are being manipulated, the right to bear arms; slowly taking away from us (US Supreme Court, …show more content…
By adding more and stricter gun laws, there will come a point that our second amendment will be taken away from the people. Stricter gun laws would make it harder for civilians to protect their home and families. If we had less gun control it would be easier to defend and protect them self when the police cannot make it in time. And criminal will think twice before committing a crime. The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people. With or without gun control law; criminals will still get a hold of one. Instead of trying to enforce more gun control laws, we should focus on educating the people about the safety of gun usage and by owning a gun does have the advantages of protect not only oneself, but your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Debate

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun advocates say guns are for protection, but they are not thinking about the mentally challenged people that should not have them. The government needs to think about this issue and pass major legislation to toughen the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves. The way to stop gun violence is to protect and elevate gun rights and educate…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org). Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If more people are encouraged to possess concealed firearms, then more criminals would be deterred from committing crimes. Lott argues that “the expected penalty of the crime affects the prospective criminal’s desire to commit a crime”(6). However, Kleck argues the opposite. He says that by restricting the supply of firearms within the country and tightening security at the Mexico border, less violence will happen. Making sure there are essentially no firearms are in circulation would lead to dramatically less gun violence, as it would make it increasingly difficult for a criminal or a mentally ill person to possess a firearm.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stricter gun laws do not prevent criminals from being in possession of guns, but instead, removes guns from law-abiding citizens thereby inhibiting their ability of self-protection. “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people” (Sub tropic Productions LLC). Gun control laws will not prevent evil people from committing homicidal acts upon the innocent. Subsequently, restrictive gun control…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays