Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

Decent Essays
Strict Interpretation of the Constitution
Strict interpretation means that the Constitution must explicitly grant a power or privilege in order for that action to be legal. A loose interpretation doesn’t give any safeguards against government intrusion on the people’s liberty. Strict interpretation is better because it is an approach more likely to get to what the original intent of the Founders of America was. Whereas loose interpretationists can make new laws and invalidate old ones based on an understanding of the Constitution. This is why Antifederalists feared a strong central government, because it could expand its powers and would likely to abuse it.
Thomas Jefferson believed that the federal government must not have too much authority

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the major problems created from the fear of an overly powerful central government, was that the states had too much individual power. Article II of the Articles of Confederation stated that “each state remains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence,” causing many problems when it came to foreign affairs, defense, and commerce. With the amount of individual power each state had, it was as if it were several countries bordering each other. In addition, when it came to foreign affairs, each state had to be spoken to separately and negotiations had to be made to accommodate each state separately and the central government was not able to properly enforce existing treaties. At the same time, the United States was facing a threat from Spain due to its holding of territories in North and South America.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first way they guarded against tyranny was federalism (Doc A). The doc says the central government can regulate trades and declare wars. The states could set up schools, make elections happen, and local governments. The governments will control each other and Themselves.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They needed something that had power over the people and let the people have power. The constitution guards against tyranny with its flexible government. Federalism is a key component of guarding against tyranny. Federalism helps guard against tyranny because it gives powers to the people and the government, which is a great way for people to not rebel.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Killer to our Country. Tyranny could take over the country, luckily the constitution guards against it. In May 1787 in Philadelphia 55 men from 11 states were at the constitutional convention to try to frame a government and hold states and people together. Also they wanted to guard against tyranny. Tyranny is when a small group of people get too much power and take over.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is the one document that essentially holds the nation together. It defines what is and is not permissible under the law of the land — it IS the law of the land. Being that slavery was a major problem during the nineteenth century (and late eighteenth century), it was only natural that historians turn towards the dogma of the United States. Although historians had different interpretations, there is only one that seemed logical and had substance. The forefathers of America whom wrote the constitution intended for it to offer protection for the institution of slavery (in other words, it was pro-slavery) because they, themselves, were slaveowners and made no conscious effort to eradicate slavery even though they had to opportunity…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protects Against Tyranny Had The Constitution not guarded against tyranny, society as we know it today would be very different. James Madison tried to create a better law system because the Articles of Confederation did not support their government. The cause of their weakness lies in the fact that they did not have a court system nor a Chief Justice. While writing The Constitution, Madison’s biggest concern was that one branch or person was going to have power over the other branches. If that would have happened it would have led way to tyranny.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation’s first flaw is that it did not give congress hardly any power. For a country to run properly and fairly, it needs to have a strong central government. When the government is not given enough power, States start to branch off and try to be…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Grabber when the government fears the people there is liberty when the people fear the government there is tyranny by thomas jefferson September 17 1887 in philadelphia the main purpose of the us. Constitution is to establish the basic rights of all american citizens and provide direction on how the government should work the constitution also provides the framework for law and order and describes the roles of the government federal judiciary branch legislative branch and executive branch The constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways which were federalism separation of power check and balances and big states vs. small states the first guard against tyranny was federalism which mearns to divide the powers between state and national governments…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution, completed and signed on September 17, 1787, is the backbone of the United States government. Composed of three parts, the Preamble, the Articles, and the Amendments, the Constitution outlines a government that “puts the power in the hands of the people” (Constitution Center, 1). It was written from May through September of 1787, but not ratified until June of 1788, when New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify the document. The Constitution was written by a plethora of authors who are referred to as the Constitutional Convention. However, some notable authors include James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams because of their drafting of the concepts in the Constitution.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays