Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
The Republicans sought for limited interpretation of the Constitution, which is known as having a strict construction. The reason they believed in having a strict construction of the Constitution was specifically to make the language clear and unambiguous. Also having a strict adherence was that if it was left open, this would allow for the constitution to be unsecure, which created the danger of the government becoming too powerful and would pose as one of the greatest threats to an individual’s liberties. This is the reason the colonist had fought in not having a national government that would employ their powers leading them back to monarchy. To Republicans, the ideas of unlimited power would restrict them from having the blessings of liberty.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They feared that that original text from the Constitution didn’t contain a bill of rights. The Federalist thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and they thought that the nation would possibly not survive without the passage from the Constitution. They also said that a stronger national government was required since the Articles of Confederation failed for not having a strong enough national…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, by Carl F. Kaestle, a historical analysis of the origin of schools from 1780-1860. Kaestle argument has the three pillars Republicanism, Protestantism, and Capitalism. The determination of the people's devotion to republican government, though their trust in dominant culture of Protestant values, and by the rise of capitalism led to the creation of a common-school system in the United States (Kaestle, X). The republicanism the commitment to forming a democratic republic. Kaestle argues that a representative republic government required educated men, to uphold the concepts of republicanisms to maintain order, to avoid anarchy, and to promote certain virtue.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Fathers wanted a government run by the population. After the Constitution was ratified, there were many political disputes. One of the most prominent political battle was between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. The author of the Declaration of Independence strongly believed in a government that gave power to the people, rather than a strong central government. Jefferson’s supporters called themselves the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Constitution Before there was even a constitution to amend and abide by, the United States government followed the Articles of Confederation. After years of the system’s lack of efficiency, the constitution was created. The constitution was a new system of necessary laws that limited governmental power and distributed it among the states. It played a major role in the lives of past Americans and continues to do so today.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States Constitution was written over the course of nearly four months and quickly became the most important document in U.S. history. Many of this historic document’s ideals can be found in two very important documents from the past. Both of these documents contained public rulers transferring their power to the people.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    American Constitution Dbq

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Picture this, the thirteen original English colonies are punished and expected to pay outrageous taxes for a war—they had virtually no part in—are resentful: Ideas of independence and nationalism cloy to the settlements. Abruptly these harmless ideas transition into serious inquires of the process for American colonies to conclude all governmental ties with Great Britain. Thus pushing past the already in place self-government documents of the Mayflower Compact to begin constructing a constitution written by second, third and even fourth generation colonists. Famously tag-lined “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” (Lincoln,1836) by none other than Abraham Lincoln during the Gettysburg Address. The American Constitution is…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Radical Republicans wanted to give the same political rights and opportunities to freed slaves that the whites had. The Radical Republicans also wanted the Bill of Rights to be created so that all men were treated…

    • 2318 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wanted to allow African-Americans to vote and hold office and wanted to transform southern society so that the planter elite no longer controlled it. The Radical Republicans passed the Wade-Davis Bill that required more than 50 percent of white males take an oath of allegiance before the state could call a constitutional convention. The bill also required that the state constitutional conventions abolish…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution: Fixed or Flexible 1.The Death Penalty: Is It Constitutional? How should judges interpret vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution? The act of interpreting vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution should be frequently revised over time, according to Thomas Jefferson, in order to meet the demands of the nation, and to satisfy the public opinion at that certain time.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the drafting of the Constitution, the ideals and philosophy behind the ideas of human rights were twisted and molded to fit the needs of both the northern and southern representatives. Considering the issue of black rights during the 18th century, the dilemma between the 2 sides was balancing on a fair. Taking into account that the north was predominantly antislavery and the south was pro-slavery, without meeting an ultimatum, the Constitution would not for the United States. The southern economy was based off of the revenue the free slave labor provided to them and the boost in a population count. The northern states contrasting with the south refused to take any of these benefits of slavery based off of the people 's ethical beliefs.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Democratic-Republicans felt that there should be a strict interpretation, which meant that the Constitution should be followed word for word. Both parties also had different views on the government. “Therefore it was that the Constitution restrained them to the necessary means, that is to say, to those means without the grant of the power would be nugatory (useless)” (Document A). Thomas Jefferson’s strict interpretation is demonstrated in this statement.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays