Strict Gun Laws

Great Essays
Throughout American history we as citizens have been able to possess and purchase firearms. Consequently, with the ownership of firearms just like the ownership of anything else, it is abused. Through this abuse there has been only one irrational reaction and that would be stricter gun control laws. However, the government, ill-advised on what to do about it imposes stricter and stricter laws but what they do not realize is that they are taking them away from those who are truly responsible enough to own one and who could very well need them. Through the stringency of these laws many things are overlooked and other can be defined as groundless, for those who have the God given right to own one should be able to own one. One thing goes above …show more content…
As a law abiding citizen and a tax payer I find it absolutely ridiculous that I am unable to obtain something that I have a god given right to possess. According to the second amendment we have the right to “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. With our rights being stated it is absolutely ridiculous that citizens who are extremely responsible human beings are getting denied at no fault of their own. In many scenarios that I have personally witnessed, the Massachusetts government continues to fail its people more and more. With such strict gun laws, they are taken out of the hands of the people when they absolutely need them the most. As a personal encounter, my boss’s wife was inside The Tannery on Boylston St. when it was held at gunpoint, and without a firearm he was helpless and couldn’t do anything to protect them (Personal Interview, Teazis). This is an example of many situations where firearms are put into the hands of those who shouldn’t have them and are taken from those who continue to earn the right to bear …show more content…
Whereas I disagree wholeheartedly with this law, it is crucial to keep those who are mentally unstable or ill from acquiring these weapons. Even though it is still possible for those who are mentally ill to slip under the radar and acquire a license for to purchase and possess firearms these laws keep them from doing even more harm. Furthermore, these laws are in place for a reason. These extremely strict gun laws do good for those who are residents in Massachusetts, “Massachusetts has one of the lowest death rates for firearms with 3.37 deaths per 100,000 residents. This is directly due to the fact that Massachusetts has only a 14.3% ownership rate”

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Massachusetts, the Court found three inconsistencies regarding the Supreme Court of Massachusetts’ ruling prohibiting the private possession of stun guns and the Court’s past rulings and precedents. The Court found that (1) the [ Massachusetts Supreme Court] explained that stun guns are not protected because they “were not in common use at the time of the Second Amendment’s enactment.” . . . This is inconsistent with Heller’s clear statement that the Second Amendment “extends . . . to . . . arms . . .…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As one may have deduced from the facts and evidence provided above, the second amendment restricts the government 's needy hands from taking firearms and it should stay as…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shooting holes in the Gun Rights Movement “Your dead kids don’t trump my constitutional rights” Since the United States of America declared its independence on July 4, 1776, guns have been an integral part of American identity. They have represented both a direct check on a possible tyrannical government and a symbol of what being American means. But if we examine the history of the 2nd Amendment and guns from a deeper perspective, we see why it’s such a controversial issue. Guns, especially now, contribute to numerous fatalities and devastatingly affect the American people, begging the question: “Is it time to place stricter checks on guns?”…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Laws Too Strict Essay

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The question, Are guns laws too strict has been asked for many years. But now, according to new studies there 's a new question, Are gun laws strict enough? According to a recent poll taken by Gallup, 55% of the people they asked aren 't satisfied with gun laws the way they sit today and actually want stricter laws(Art Swift. . . up sharply). This should come as no surprise considering the increase in mass shootings across the united states each year.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to this decision the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 also restricted residents from owning handguns except for those registered prior to 1975. In about every state now there is a law that states, “Every citizen has a fundamental right to bear arms in defense of himself or herself and the state. Any restriction on this right shall be subject to strict scrutiny”. Specifically in the state of Washington the state law is “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most widely debated topics in recent months has been about the right to bear arms. It is a constitutionally protected right which has been widely misused in fights for, and against, social justice. A piece of paper cannot fight for itself, therefore, citizens must fight for this right in order to uphold the rule of law, and rights of individuals in America. The best way to protect the right to bear arms is through responsible control, crime mitigation, and education. Gun control, when implemented responsibly, is effective in reducing gun related, violent crime.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, citizens in the United States have used guns to protect themselves, their families, and their nation. As Americans sit down to watch the news each day, they are witness to an increasing number of shootings in many different forms, which range from schools to live interviews. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the second amendment in the Bill of Rights. However, there are some citizens who believe that if stricter laws are put into place regarding gun control, their second amendment rights will be violated. So, what is too far and what is not?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the course of recent years, Americans' support for rigid gun control laws has been declining even as the number of mass shootings is on the ascent. Gun control is a standout amongst the most forcefully divisive issues in the U.S. today. Envision appreciating a film at the theater or eating a dinner at Taco Bell while individuals surrounding you are conveying stacked arms. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be inconceivable, it is conceivable in light of the fact that the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives residents the privilege to have and convey weapons.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Policy

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The overall purpose of the gun control policy is to reduce the number of guns getting into the hands of people who are not legally licensed. Depending on the state, it also may or may not be required that you do a background check or have a license for gun purchases. For example, in the New York State, background check and having a licensed for gun purchases is required. However, in a state like Florida, background checks or having a license for gun purchases is not required. Despite this idea of background checks for gun purchases, there is also this idea of high-capacity magazine ban that prohibits people from selling and owning guns with high capacity as they are able to kill people rapidly because they do not need to be reloaded as fast.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it were in my hands to do something and have competence to change the laws, I would let individuals carry and or own weapons but they would need to have mental screenings between six months to a year to make sure that they are still capable of operating a firearm at one hundred percent. For example if a person owns a firearm suddenly gets into an accident and has becomes physically disabled affecting his eyesight or range of motion, he should be re-tested and or should be subjected to recertified. He or she should be able to pass the physical and mental requirements. Background checks and screenings are a necessity before a person get certified to own a gun or any kind of weapon permitted by the second amendment. If these precautions are taken our innocent society will not have to suffer from stress, fear of life, and the torture that comes from gun violence related…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    More than one hundred thousand people are involved in a shooting each year in the United States of America. (irrelevant). Gun control has become a major topic in the last couple of decades in America. It’s a very controversial issue around the world, in communities, and in some families. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of the new ban argue that assault weapons are the reason behind the mass shootings that have continuously happened. However, what the supporters do not realize is that the mental health state of the person is the real issue and that banning assault weapons is limiting the right civilians have to defend themselves. The purpose of these amendments was to ensure that no matter what at the end of the day, the civilians were being put first. Therefore, creating this ban is contradicting what the main purpose was. If the government were to actually pay attention to what was really going on they would realize there is no reason for the ban, there are always other solutions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mae Ballah English 1302 Professor Larson 5 November 2014 Americans have had the right to own handguns and other forms of fire arms since 1791, this right is guaranteed under the second amendment which state “A well- regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” However For some time now there has been a debate as to whether or not handguns for citizens should be legal or not, this debate has been increasing in controversy with recent events such as the school shootings at Columbine and the Virginia Tech Massacre. Many Americans believe that if the government were to ban hand guns and other fire arms tragedies such as the Virginia Tech Massacre…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays