Strepsiades 'Use Of Sophistry In Socrates'

Improved Essays
Entering the school as a student, Strepsiades continuously asks about sophistry, saying to Socrates, “I want instruction in your second Logic, you know the one––the get-away-without-paying argument.” (The Clouds, p26) When Socrates instead begins teaching him other concepts, Strepsiades childishly demands, “Logic! Logic! Teach me your immoral Logic!” (The Clouds, p52) In Strepsiades’ case, the desire to learn sophistry in order to exploit debt collection outweighs any curiosity or respect for the pursuit of logic. The Clouds discuss Strepsiades’ follies, judging him by nature, saying “such is wickedness, such its fatal fascination: this senile amateur of fraud, by greed and guile obsessed, frantic to disown his debts.” (The Clouds, p96) Whether Socrates …show more content…
“I found that those who had the highest reputation were nearly the most deficient, while those who were thought to be inferior were more knowledgeable.” (Apology, 22.a) Plato states that the best way for a philosopher to survive is to remain a private figure, therefore, those who claimed to practice philosophy with high reputations, such as sophists, were false philosophers. Aristophanes describes the fame that Strepsiades would receive if mastering sophistry, “Your life shall be the envy of all mankind.” and “before long thousands of clients will stampede to your doors, begging, pleading, imploring your service and advice in all their lawsuits––many involving incredible sums.” (The Clouds, p40) Both Plato and Aristophanes agree that sophistry will bring fame and money, but neither confirm that this is the life of a true

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Satisfied with their agreement Plato introduces his main argument. He states, that just as there is a difference between good and bad bites, there is likewise a difference between good actions and bad actions, or even, more broadly speaking, between a life well lived and lives…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sophists were a category of narrators, educators, writers, and supporters, who received the reputation for their displays of language and for dazing their audiences with their “brilliant” styles, intriguing appearances and loud personalities. The Sophists believed that law was conservative/cautious and truth was relative. Seeing persuasion as the center of education, they also believed their practices of persuasion should be accessible for anybody to learn. Sophists were social freethinkers who questioned the foundational assumptions of Greek society through shock and provocation. They taught rhetoric, careful management of resources, and some aspects of leadership.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This not only helped their cause to find truth, but it allowed other citizens to critically examine different aspects of their lives, reaching a higher level of awareness and knowledge themselves. As more sophists emerged into society, they gained more respect in Roman society. Eventually, philosophers were valued and hired as private tutors for the wealthy members and children of…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate how Socrates replied to the main charge he was…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If Socrates is to successfully refute Thrasymachus and prove that it does in fact pay to be just, then he needs to find out precisely what it means to be just before moving on to whether or not it is beneficial to act in accordance with justice. However the only way in which good progress can be made is Socrates can get his opponent to sincerely believe in their discussion, and he fails to do this. After the “wage-earner” argument, the reader is reminded that the essence of Thrasymachus’ argument is that the unjust life is better and more profitable than the just. Socrates announces he will use a question-and-answer technique to tackle this position on justice, Thrasymachus is given no choice but to comply. When Socrates asks his opponent to answer truthfully, Thrasymachus responds by asking whether or not it even matters if he says what he really believes.…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Roche’s The Great Encounter, a foreword in The Oedipus Plays of Sophocles lays out truths about human life, both as a single entity and as a component of a much larger universe interconnecting each and everyone one of us. Throughout the piece are scattered ‘general truths’ that serve to summarize aspects of human morality and accomplishment and detail the limits of one’s intellectual self, some of which I can assent to and others which I do not completely agree with. To begin, Roche declares that, “though we may be innocent, we are all potentially guilty, because of the germ of self-sufficiency and arrogance in our nature” (Roche ix), an assertion which I definitely agree with, for it is in human nature to act in the favor of one’s self-interest.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Phidippides is given the chance to help out his father, who pleads with Phidippides to "reverse your way of life as soon as possible, and go learn what I'm going to recommend" (Aristophanes 19). Phidippides agrees to do whatever his father says and Strepsiades tells him to attend the thinkery, where Phidippides will learn how to argue. If Phidippides can learn the Worse or Unjust Argument, Strepsiades can get away with not paying off his debt. However, Phidippides snubs the thinkery and those who live there so he refuses. Even after Strepsiades makes Phidippides swear up and down to do as he says, Phidippides ends up going back on his word.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was a Greek philosopher and the main source of Western thought. Little is known of his life except what was recorded by his students, including Plato. In Book I of Plato’s “The Republic”, Socrates and Glaucon were ‘asked’ to join Polemarchus along with Adeimantus and others at Polemarchus’ house (sp. 327-328c). Even though he was coerced into this discussion, Socrates shared his knowledge with the assembly.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    [Topic sentence] Despite Socrates’ claim that his method of argument amounts to a disinterested pursuit of truth, at certain points in his discussion with Gorgias, he relies on rhetorical appeals to gain an advantage in the debate. [transition to more specific point] These often take the form of ethos appeals directed at the crowd of young men watching the debate. [Set-up/context for quote] For example, at one point, Socrates interrupts the discussion about the function of rhetoric in order to remind Gorgias that there is more at stake for him in their conversation than merely winning or losing:…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of Socrates progressive ideas was that he was not materialistic and did not lust after money or power. Socrates boldly claims “in my investigation of the service of the god I found that those who had the highest reputation were nearly the most deficient, were nearly the most deficient, while those who thought to be inferior were more knowledgeable” (25). This brazen quote rejects the common notion that those of wealth and prestige who hold the power of Athens are the ones who are superior in knowledge. Socrates, in his search for truth, compares the politicians to craftsmen in this quote. For when he investigated the claim that he is the wisest, Socrates compared the lowly craftsman to the powerful politician and found that the craftsman were wiser than those who held power.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Strategies of Plato vs. Aristophanes In Aristophanes’ “Clouds” and Plato’s “Apology” Socrates is satirically attacked and rationally defended respectively. The two argumentative styles of Aristophanes and Plato are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Aristophanes utilizes satire and humorous exaggerations of sophist teachings to denounce Socrates. Alternatively, Plato’s “Apology” uses logic and reason in order to defend himself against the charges brought against him.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the first half of his speech, Socrates recounts the tale of his trip to the oracle of Delphi where he was told that he was the wisest man alive. Bewildered by this statement, he set off on a journey to find one wiser than him and continuously drew blank. One consistent trait he found among those considered to be the most wise by society was that they seemed to speak with authority on matters that didn’t concern them or that they did not know much about. Socrates uses this example to highlight a flaw in the human condition; humans often speak about matters that are not in their realm of knowledge to appear wise but this is not real wisdom and is in fact, ignorance. A symbol of true wisdom is one who knows what they know and what they do not and does not claim to be better or smarter than they are.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sophists include Adeimantus, Thrasymachus, and others. By definition sophists are “ancient Greek teachers of rhetoric, philosophy, and the art of successful living.” Sophists are paid to reason so they don’t like to actually reason so they don’t put up with people that actually think like Socrates. A couple of the key controversial points that Socrates makes are that men and women are equal, that procreation shouldn’t be done whenever, and that if kids want to be guardians they should be going to war and observing it.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right or Wrong, Win In society it is believed that is impossible for one person to corrupt the thoughts of a whole group of people. On the other hand, it has been proved that it is possible for one person to influence and subsequently lead to the corruption of thoughts. Following Socrates’ death, we the Athenians became inspired to ferret out and execute other individuals who might be guilty of corrupting our youth. One of the individuals we will put on trial for this is Meletus, the youngest of the three prosecutors that accused Socrates of this matter.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays