Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Weak Program

Decent Essays
The Strength and Weakness of the Strong Program
Introduction
The strong program is a particular kind of sociology science that was developed by Barry Barnes and David Bloor to describe science as it allows the explanation of scientific beliefs with similar description. The concept originated from Edinburgh school in the mid-1970s where it was used as a reaction against earlier theories which were considered weak. In most cases, failed theories are usually explained by mentioning the biases that were overlooked by the researchers; therefore, sociology would be only marginally relevant to successful theories that reveal a true fact of nature. A strong program accommodates theories that are either considered true or false and treat them equally;
…show more content…
By analyzing these components, the weakness and the strength of the program can be easily determined. Additionally, each component has its own weakness and strengths; therefore, the same component may provide a weakness while at the same time act as strength for the strong program.
Causality
Under the causality component, every situation is provided with an explanation that describes the cause of the results. Here, the component observes the psychological and conditions under which the theory is applied to give an explanation that matches with the cause. In this case, the weakness may be raised in instances where the theory under scrutiny does not provide a clear cause-effect relationship. On the hand, the strength of the theory will be supported by normal cases where the explanation of the result marches clearly with the cause.
…show more content…
In other words, the success and the failure of the belief are accommodated in the same explanation leading to harmonized description of scientific theories. This is opposed to weaker programs that offered explanation for either successful or unsuccessful claims leading parallel explanation of related but opposing ideas. This component strengthens the program by accommodating the use of similar explanation for two opposing ideas. However, the weakness of the program is clearly apparent in unique cases where the same explanation is not applicable.
Reflexivity
Unlike other weaker programs, the strong program can be used to explain itself. The same principles that are used in explaining other theories can be self-administered to give the same results. This is unique to the program since the principles in other programs are used in other theories apart from the theories themselves. Under this component, the strong program can be either weak or strong depending on whether the idea is applicable or not.
The Strength of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Little Leaguer Case Study

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. When a biologist faculty member as Wilson’s University “waived his hand dismissively,” what did is gesture signify? When the Biologist “waived his hand dismissively,” at Wilson, I believe that this was a way of “looking down” on Wilson’s “soft” science area of practice. Why did Wilson refer to himself as a “Little Leaguer”?…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal: Pascal’s Wager essentially revolves around the fact that betting on God’s existence is the best bet that one can make. This is because if one wagers on God’s existence and God doesn’t exist, they lose nothing. However, if he does exist, then the can potentially gain entrance into Heaven which is the ultimate reward. Therefore, betting on God’s existence is the best bet that one can possibly make. Pascal’s Wager excludes the important virtues that support Christianity and serves as a mainly self-centered principal.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Appeal to Pathos: Examples: “You will surely make your dear mother happy should you make her breakfast.” “When you finally leave for college, I will be the only child left. I’m sure I will find myself all alone far more often, all without a fleeting bit of hope left. The last one left, that’s me. ... College awaits, no?”…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is a Logical Fallacy, Exactly? The word "fallacy" comes from the Latin "fallacia" which means "deception, deceit, trick, artifice," however, a more specific meaning in logic (a logical fallacy) that dates back to the 1550s means "false syllogism, invalid argumentation." http://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/2016/?adv=Donald+Trump%E2%80%99s+Argument+for+America In this ad “Trump Argument for America” supported by Trump campaign was published on November 06 2016.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo Social Structure

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on his study, what would you conclude about the impact of social structure on social interaction? That even if we are normally one thing we are willing to behave/conform to what we think society is telling us we have to be. We are willing to assimilate within the group or surroundings (based on which side you’re viewing) due to what we perceive our position to be and assume the associated roles/norms that go with it. And sometimes just to maintain our own sanity.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the book Freakonomics the authors, Stephen Levitt and Stephen Dubner, takes a novel approach to studying economics, sharing its most interesting research. First they begin with the topic of correlation and causation. According to them correlation means, “A relationship exists between two factors—let’s call them X and Y—but it tells you nothing about the direction of that relationship. It’s possible that X causes Y; it’s also possible that Y causes X; and it may be that X and Y are both being caused by some other factor, Z. ” (8). One the other hand, causation is when one object affects the other object.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Coherentism

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is coherentism about justification plausible? When it comes to the acquisition of a true belief leading to knowledge, it is thought that these beliefs should be justified. Coherentism is a form of internal, non-linear justification which holds the idea that for a belief to be justified in any way it must cohere with a current system of beliefs. BonJour wrote that 'what justifies beliefs is the way they fit together' , in essence, for beliefs to be justified they must metaphorically form a lattice like structure, where they each support each other, creating a non-linear structure of justification. Coherentism is mostly considered as an internal form of justification as this process of reflection on our current beliefs to accommodate new ones is an internal, mental process, as opposed to those external theories of justification such as foundationalism which rely on empirical and perceptual data forming core beliefs together being the source of justification.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cause and effect are something we all thought we wouldn’t need after elementary school. This is erroneous however because everything in our world falls under a cause and effect scenario. For example in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s, The Great Gatsby, money is the cause for the character’s actions and attributes, and this, in turn, affects the events of the novel. During the 1920’s, when The Great Gatsby took place, wealth was one of the most dominant influences in their society.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Battle of the Minds Wrought with regimented formulas and unfeeling calculations, the idea of science as an unyielding regiment circulates as popular belief. To the majority of the population the process of creating a hypothesis, preforming an experiment, and formulating a conclusion repeats indefinitely until someone reaches a breakthrough. However, this seemingly unending cycle fails to encompass the inconstancy of the scientific process. The scientific findings surrounding the discovery of the structure of DNA, or Deoxyribonucleic acid, proves that the scientific process results from a nonlinear process.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Clarissa Eashmond November 14, 2017 CD 351 Theorist Paper Theory, it defined by Merriam-Webster, in relation to the development of children, as a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena. It is also defined as an idea or set of ideas that is intended…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to explain something, we need evidence, however; this evidence cannot support itself without other evidence; henceforth, we gain this evidence through the…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causality is the structure of cause and effect, the relationship completely. For A must come before B, A being the cause and B the effect. This is one of the necessary conditions that need to be met, for causation to be applicable. At least three, need to be met altogether, such as temporal priority over cause and effect, and continuity. These conditions also have to happen at the same time, or it is not credible.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics