Strategic Bombing In World War II

Improved Essays
The main ideas presented in Major Problems in the History of World War II: Chapter 4 revolve around the analysis of the use of strategic bombing and its effects on the war. Documents presented in this chapter focus on the importance of naval and air warfare as well as the most effective way to defeat Germany as presented by allied leaders. Historians Richard Overy and Michael S. Sherry provide their analyses of the importance of airpower in the war and how it affected all parties involved in the war. Overy discusses the importance of naval and air power and how strategic bombings were able to shape the outcome of the war, while Sherry talks more about the destruction caused by the bombings during the war was directly linked to fanaticism that …show more content…
Overy states that the bombings were vital to reducing German production and decreasing German morale in hopes of ending the war in a more timely manner. He states that "to understand what bombing has achieved it is necessary, though agonizingly difficult, to lay aside the moral issue. Its strategic merits or limitations are distinct from its ethical implications, however closely they have become entwined in the contemporary debate."147 This sentiment is reiterated in Document #3 Major Problems in the History of World War II: Chapter 4. A mother of a bomber pilot is concerned that her son 's sole job in the war will be to spread death and destruction. The letter is curtailed through a reply that justifies the necessary evils of the technology at the disposal of the Americans. American leaders believed that the ends justified the means and Sherry examines this sentiment by indicating that the use of strategic bombings was seen as a necessary evil to ensure survival and success. He equates this necessity for victory as "validating any means of means of destruction that vaguely promised to secure it, since political authority defined the path to victory as lying so substantially through production and technology."152 Sherry asserts that the Allied powers would do whatever it took to win the war even if it included bombings that were not strategically important and that was derived from technological fanaticism while Overy claims that everything done in the war effort was for the greater good of the world. These distinctions are evident with the Allied powers "overkill" approach to end the war with the bombings of the Dresden and the Japanese cities. They believed destruction would suit their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Kennedy and his managerial “whiz kids” took office, they challenged traditionally accepted policies and sought a wider range of diplomatic options. Significantly impacted by crises in both Berlin and Cuba, Kennedy and his acolytes deplored the dearth of Eisenhower’s military force alternatives. Very little diplomatic maneuvering room existed within massive retaliation’s “all or nothing construct.” Among Kennedy’s criticisms, Eisenhower’s nuclear policy rested upon the flawed fundamental premise that a thermonuclear war was winnable. After staring down the barrel of Armageddon, many in the administration, particularly Defense Secretary McNamara, came to agree with Eisenhower’s personally held belief deeming the offensive use of nuclear…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the document we have a scientist by the name of Karl T. Compton that after the bombing of Japan had gone to see the state of post war Japan. He was there for the main reason to see the atomic bombs effects, and to see if it should have been used in the first place. On one hand if the U.S. had not used the bombs then an invasion would to have to occur which would mean lots of casualties on both sides just to invade, and not including the take over. Aslo if the Allies had invaded and then Japan surrendered the people would not have, and they would have probably kept on fighting. Even then the atomic bombs still was a minor deterrent to some Japanese escape to the ones far from the bombed cities.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paul Fussell, U.S Infantryman in Europe stated, “When bombs were dropped and the news began to circulate that we would not be obligated in a few months to rush up the beaches near Tokyo assault-firing while being machine-gunned, mortared and shelled we broke down and cried with relief and joy”(Document H). A land invasion of Japan would have been inevitable if the bombs had not been dropped on Japan. A day similar to D-Day would have occurred which would have undoubtedly created more problems. The American soldiers rejoiced at the bombing of Japan because they knew that the fighting was over and their lives would not be at risk anymore in the war. Document E depicts a physical map of Japan.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Hersey and Uchida use personal stories to persuade their audience that the United States’ ends did not justify their means. In Hiroshima Mr. Tanimoto ran into the city to search for his wife and child who had just arrived in time for the explosion. When he found them, “ Mr. Tanimoto was so emotionally worn out that nothing could surprise him. He did not embrace his wife; he simply said, ‘ Oh, you are safe’”(Hersey, 30). Hersey’s audience in this text was the american people during world war two whose perspective on the Japanese was that they were inhumane and therefore dropping the bomb was just.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of the atomic bomb is one of the most controversial topics discussed in United States history. One key figure involved in the decision-making process to use the bomb against Japan is Henry L. Stimson. Stimson served as the Secretary of War under President William Howard Taft, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Harry S. Truman. Furthermore, he performed as the Secretary of State for President Herbert Hoover. In the book, Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the Decision to Use the Bomb against Japan, Sean L. Malloy provides an extremely credible study of Stimson’s relationship with the atomic bomb.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand once the bomb was dropped one of the unjustifiable arguments against the bomb was the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Airpower was very decisive in the winning of World War II. It allowed the allied forces the ability to strike manufacturing center, supply lines, and the command and control infrastructure of the enemy. Without airpower the allied forces would have to have taken the ground to get to these strategic targets that would have been heavily fortified to prevent such attacks. Airpower was also used as a tactical force providing air support for ground troops, direct attacks on naval vessels and airfields. Airpower also took a psychological toll on the civilian populations, in that they would feel the wrath of war directly by bombing and strafing attacks.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World War II was a horrific ordeal. Many people, innocent people, died during this war. There are many war survivors that believe that warfare is horrid and they share how the war affected them firsthand. Many of the survivors of the firebombing of Dresden lent their testimonies of what happened hoping that it would gain public awareness so people could see the tragedies of war. In Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Was it Necessary to Drop the Atomic Bomb to End World War II?” The United States of America was and still is one of the biggest countries in the world when it comes to power and demand. Developing such a weapon as the Atomic bomb that can scare and destroy anyone and anything, was in United States favor. But was it really necessary to use a weapon this powerful and dangerous? Yes, I think so. This essay is about my and the two professors Robert James Maddox and Tsuyoshi Hasegawa point of view; if it was necessary to drop the Atomic bombs to end the war.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrasting World War I versus. World War II History is the past, and it’s important to reflect on the past, to help ensure that as a society we don’t repeat mistakes. At the time of both World War I and World War II, each became the largest war in history up until that point. Each war shared tremendous amounts of death, and the involvement of many countries, so it’s crucial to analyze the causes and the factors of each war to truly see the nature of the circumstances revolving both wars.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays