1. The purpose
a. To compare and contrast two stories
b. To summarize each story
2. Who is it for?
a. Anyone who enjoys reading
b. Anyone who likes comparison
3. What is the thesis?
a. Analytical
I am comparing the short stories, “The machine that won the war” and “The story of an hour”.
In the story, “The machine that won the war” the main conflict was between John and Max. They argued about which machine won the war and why Max wouldn’t tell John the data he gave his machine. Max thought John wouldn’t believe him if he told him the data he put into his machine, nevertheless he finally told John that he didn’t think he would believe him. The setting of this story was in the 1900’s and it was clearly stated. The main characters, John and Max, were very serious and business minded. This paper is an analytical thesis. Therefore meaning, I am breaking down parts of this paper to …show more content…
Almost like a hanger. In “The machine that won the war” it ends with, “Heads or tails gentlemen? Said Swift.” In “The story of an hour” it ended with, “When the doctors came in they said she had died of heart disease-of the joy that kills.”
Both stories included a conflict. “The machine that won the war” had a conflict between people. In “The story of an hour” in some form, it was the same conflict. “The story of an hour” had two deaths in it and in “The machine that won the war” it had none. In “The machine that won the war” John and Max were business minded and very serious. Where “The story of an hour” had a more freeing feeling and not so tense feeling.
This is my comparison and contrast essay of the two short stories “The machine that won the war” and “The story of an hour”. I hope I got across to you the issue and ideas of both stories.
Cited: Stanza 4 Line 3 -barrington.220.org Stanza 4 Line 4 & 5-