Storm Over Texas Summary

Improved Essays
Laura Sell
DCUSH- period 1
27 November 2017
Storm over Texas Book Review Storm over Texas: The Annexation controversy and the road to Civil War by Joel H. Silbey is a comprehensive read about the journey of Texas becoming a part of the United States. The author, Joel H. Silbey, discusses the challenges and wars the people of Texas faced and how they eventually concurred them and gained independent from Mexico and then the journey of annexation into the United States. Through the book, Storm over Texas, he shares the historical events that shaped Texas and the United States and how they grew to where they are today, economically and geographically. In the Spring of 1844, there were many political conflicts effected both Texas and the Union.
…show more content…
Daniel Barnard states that, “as certain as truth and God exist, the admission of Texas into the Union will prove, sooner or later, an element of overwhelming ruin to the republic…” (Silbey xvii). His statement that when Texas is admitted to the Union, that the republic will be overwhelming foreshadows the thesis that Texas has an enormous effect on the Union politically. For instance, Texas influences the Union from 1844 to close the Mexican- American War and its aftermath, through the political peaks and drops accompanied by the spread of slavery and free. When Texas was annexed into the Union, there was much sectional animosity within the Jacksonian-era national politics. Texas caused a transformation of North vs South antagonism and moved the United States toward the Civil War. This quote that Daniel Barnard said is appropriate for the book because it foreshadows one of the thesis within the book, Storm over Texas. The author also explains this thesis from a Texans point of view. A first-class person explains that, “a sudden, resounding fire bell in the …show more content…
The leadership of both major political parties opposed the introduction of Texas. The democratic party was led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison who supported a strict interpretation of the Constitution, neutral relations with European powers, and stronger state government. They also believed that the economy should be based on agriculture and opposed the creation of the national bank. The Whigs were created in 1834 that opposed the Democratic views and was led by Andrew Jackson. They believed in a strong national bank, strong federal government, and economic protection and tariffs. These two political parties had the exact opposite views of how the country should be run. By the two parties having different views, it caused many arguments and they were forced to create many compromises. The “Texas annexation was mainly a partisan rather than sectional issue, with Democrats from both South and North in favor and most Whigs in both sections against it” (Silbey xi). This quote is significant to the book because it shows the major problems of political parties in the United States. The political aspects of the annexation of Texas effected how the United States resolved the problems following Texas’s annexation such as, the ongoing conflict of slavery and free people. There were also many disagreements that politicians had to resolve. For example, people tried to get treaties passed to annex

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Cornerstone Speech

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alexander H. Stephens was known as the Vice President of Confederacy. As you know the Confederacy was a strong supporter of the idea of enslavement of Africans. They also believed that there was not any moral issues because they were not actual people. We today however know that this is completely incorrect. Alexander Stephens will eventually give a speech addressing the Confederate named the Cornerstone.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it first became a state, land and cattle were a large portion of the economy, but when Pattillo Higgins and Anthony Lucas found oil, oil became what outsiders associate the state with. Texas’s government takes up the next portion of her book. When Texas was established, Texans wanted very little to do with the government. Because of this, the Texas legislature only meets one-hundred and forty days every two years. Texas also went through quite a few constitutions and finally landed on one that greatly limits the government. The political party of Texas has also been changing.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan politics in the Early Republic took place because of the need to have a strong central government for the Americas. The draft of the American Constitution was a way that national leaders would form the laws and decisions of the government for the people. Federalist agreed to these terms, and antifederalist were opposed, but lost their fight to the Federalist. The people of early United States lives had changed with the change of politics. Northern people freed black slaves, while in the South, African Americans faced increased laws, and the Indians traditional cultures were attacked.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The increase of sectionalism was an important act formed by the events following the Mexican-American War by causing states to secede, transportation developments, and eventually leading to the start of America’s bloodiest battle, the Civil War. These events led to how America is viewed by people today and what our state’s rights are and will be. By the end of the Mexican-American War, America had gained rights over California and many southern states. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery between the states was an ongoing complication that began to cause conflicts. The conflicts created led acts established by the people that became an important statement for why the Mexican-American War and the Civil War were started.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Molly Ivins’s essay, “Is Texas America?” states various points in her essay about Texas politics, demographics, geography, and education. The “Is Texas America?” essay is according to the author’s perspective about Texas. There are various statements within Ivins’s essay that are supporting and contradictory to the modern-day Texas. The reason there is a difference in the number of supporting and contradicting statements about Texas within Ivins’s essay is because Texas is changing over time where the contradicting statements may have been true in the past.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The entire country was under a crisis during the 1840s and 1850s. After the Mexican-American war ended in the late 1840s, the country was in disagreement over the new territories…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quick war was fought and Mexico lost, as terms of their surrender Mexico essentially gave the United States the West Coast, which includes California, New Mexico, and Arizona. The war between the Mexico and United States could be connected to Manifest Destiny because people in Texas did not want to abide by the Mexican laws because they felt they did not have to follow because it was not in God’s will. For Manifest Destiny gave them the right to settle as far west as they want and not follow any other rules except for America, because America was permitted by God to settle west. Manifest Destiny and westward expansion was also a political factor because it allowed for President James Polk to come to power, and spur on westward expansion. Under James Polk, the victory of…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Annexation Of Texas Essay

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In so doing, it worsened the divisions which were taking place over issues such as slavery and states’ rights throughout the United States at the time. With the annexation of Texas therefor contributing…

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Sleuthing The Alamo, James E. Crisp goes beyond the mere description of the historical events that took place during the Texas Revolution. Crisp’s passion to uncover why certain events of the Texas Revolution were remembered in a specific way, propelled him to closely examine and critically analyze the motive behind a number of writers and historians. It was this determination that forced Crisp to take no for an answer and to “attempt to separate Texas myth from Texas history”. What makes Crisp’s book Sleuthing The Alamo so unique, in contrast with most historical books, is that Crisp involves himself in his text in such a way that it becomes very personal to him. Additionally, Crisp doesn’t conceal his own personal biases as…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immigration In Texas Essay

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Long before the current situation, Texas had immigration issues but in contrasting form. Immigration in Texas during the 1830s consisted of “white, English-speaking Americans who were looking for a better life in Texas. And the authorities who were trying to keep them out were Mexican” (Root, 2012). Centuries later this situation evolved into the illegal immigration issue that Texas is dealing with today. What makes this situation more of a controversy now than before is the vast numbers of illegal immigrants seeking a new beginning in Texas and the limited economic resources that are available to support them.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While America began to expand and become more industrialize, not everybody agreed with the ideas and concepts. Due to the difference in opinion there was a lot of controversy and voiced opinions about the westward expansions. While some Americans supported Westward expansions, there was others who opposed Westward expansions. Also some Americans supported the Mexican War, while others opposed the Mexican war. However, both the Westward expansion and the Mexican war had positive and negative effects to the country we live in today.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jacob Ashcraft 24 October 2016 Texas Revolution Was Inevitable In one of the first major scholarly works on the Texas Revolution, historian Eugene C. Barker in 1928 described the conflict as a “clash of cultures.” Barker maintained that Anglo-Texans and Mexicans had little in common and, as a result, concluded that the rebellion could not have been avoided. Barker is correct in his statement about war being inevitable. Some believe it was because the Anglo colonists wanted overrun Texas and break away to become a part of the United States in the venture westward.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays