Stop Question And Frisk Paper

“Stop, Question, and, Frisk” is considered the practice in which Police Officers stop people on the street based on reasonable suspicion of a criminal activity. The practice of “Stop Question and Frisk” by the NYPD is not efficient in New York. In this research paper we will discuss why we think the practice of “Stop, Question, and frisk” was not efficient in New York. To support the statement provide in this paper, we are going to used reliable sources to made this paper interesting, and reliable at the same time. One of the sources that we are going to used is New York Time The mains point that we are going to be cover is how the program of “Stop and Question Frisk” affect the Hispanic, and Black community. Also statistic of how many arrest police officers made from all of the people …show more content…
According to the New York Times one of the judge of the federal district ruled” that the tactics underlying New York City’s stop and frisk program violated the constitutional rights of minority citizens”. Based on the statement made by this judge we can see how those police officers who work in those area did not fallow the rule when they were entitle to stop someone. Also this professional prove the point that we tried to make about Stop, Question, and Frisk, that this program did not have any positive effect in New York City. The purpose for this program was to reduce crime, and make our communities safe by, stopping people with a reasonable suspicion, but instead it made the people believe that police officers only stop some people, and the crime rate still the same. Stop, question, and frisk was not the best program that the city could invent to fight crime, they know that this program was not the wright move, because officers would stop some instead of everybody that look