The Daily Show - Consequence-Free Speech
Stewart John during this podcast criticizes an NBA sports and political personnel. The structure itself comes from a network named “Comedy Central’. Compared to our podcast, The Daily Show had focused far more on criticisms. The main genres that the podcast focuses on is politics and comedy. The comedic touch towards the podcast was that he was able to keep audiences entertained by making a humorous atmosphere with jokes and mocking other people while we had focus on our topic more seriously as we had wanted to inform people about our views on an academic standard. I believe that Stewart John should have tried to criticized a variety of people with different political backgrounds rather than just people …show more content…
The genres that can be associated with his podcast would be politics and educational which shares the same similarities genre wise with our podcast. Rather than trying to convince people to follow his political views, Dave tries to inform people about the current situation of politics while keeping the atmosphere quite serious. Our podcast also focused on trying to enable people to understand our political points rather than trying to convince people to follow our political agenda. The difference was that guests which provided a more diverse selection of information compared to him but overall we shared the most similarities with Dave’s podcast.
The Pilot episode certainly went out as planned as we were able to let our audience understand what the format of the podcasts will be like and what’s going to happen during each session. The series is intended to be viewed as a political and educational podcast that invites many guests from different backgrounds to enable people to understand from a variety among of …show more content…
My high qualities of influence allowed me to make the group agree on the topic of freedom of speech as I talked about how it was astonishingly correlated to our modern-day society. To set a good example for my members, I would come towards our meetings ten minutes early to show my commitment towards the group. During the discussions, I would try to input my innovative ideas and how the podcast should be formatted. I also included the opportunity cost which are other alternatives that may be used in the podcast. I made a group setting enjoyable and was not willing to stand down and be “shy” or “embarrassed”. I truly showed them that I genuinely cared about our group hence “be creative”, ‘be smart”, ‘make friends’ and ‘have fun’ were my key
Stewart John during this podcast criticizes an NBA sports and political personnel. The structure itself comes from a network named “Comedy Central’. Compared to our podcast, The Daily Show had focused far more on criticisms. The main genres that the podcast focuses on is politics and comedy. The comedic touch towards the podcast was that he was able to keep audiences entertained by making a humorous atmosphere with jokes and mocking other people while we had focus on our topic more seriously as we had wanted to inform people about our views on an academic standard. I believe that Stewart John should have tried to criticized a variety of people with different political backgrounds rather than just people …show more content…
The genres that can be associated with his podcast would be politics and educational which shares the same similarities genre wise with our podcast. Rather than trying to convince people to follow his political views, Dave tries to inform people about the current situation of politics while keeping the atmosphere quite serious. Our podcast also focused on trying to enable people to understand our political points rather than trying to convince people to follow our political agenda. The difference was that guests which provided a more diverse selection of information compared to him but overall we shared the most similarities with Dave’s podcast.
The Pilot episode certainly went out as planned as we were able to let our audience understand what the format of the podcasts will be like and what’s going to happen during each session. The series is intended to be viewed as a political and educational podcast that invites many guests from different backgrounds to enable people to understand from a variety among of …show more content…
My high qualities of influence allowed me to make the group agree on the topic of freedom of speech as I talked about how it was astonishingly correlated to our modern-day society. To set a good example for my members, I would come towards our meetings ten minutes early to show my commitment towards the group. During the discussions, I would try to input my innovative ideas and how the podcast should be formatted. I also included the opportunity cost which are other alternatives that may be used in the podcast. I made a group setting enjoyable and was not willing to stand down and be “shy” or “embarrassed”. I truly showed them that I genuinely cared about our group hence “be creative”, ‘be smart”, ‘make friends’ and ‘have fun’ were my key