Steve Harmon's Murder

Decent Essays
Steve Harmon is innocent. If he were guilty he wouldn’t write down everything. He has nothing to hide from the jurors. It surprised Steve when Petrocelli stated Mr. Nesbitt’s cause of death. He didn’t know that Mr. Nesbitt was murdered until he was accused of the murder. What follows is an explanation of why Steve is innocent for the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. However, it is my belief that Steve is also guilty for other aspects of this wrongful death. First, I will explain why Steve is innocent for the charge of murder. To date all we know is that Steve was part of the crime. He has been writing everything down, telling us the truth about the crime. Although, he was involved in the robbery part of the crime. We call this, accessory to murder.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Was the Verdict correct? Although the trial ends with a verdict of not guilty, it is not made clear whether or not Steve was completely innocent. I believe, that Steve didn’t take part in the murder or the crime based off of evidence in the story. First of all, Steve Harman is scared to death of jail.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q1 The Simon Gittany Murder Case features an intimate femicide. This is evident in how the perpetrator, Gittany, behaved and how he treated his partner, Lisa Harnum, prior to her death. Intimate femicide almost always consists of the perpetrator being possessive and controlling of his partner, and also features a sudden outburst of rage before the homicide takes place. Both of these factors occurred in the case, and were thus referred to domestic violence.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that Josie Jo Ford is the one who killed Sam Westing. She possibly killed Sam because he would refuse to pay the unexcepted payments she would give him. She keeps information to herself and her secretary. I also noticed that she hurried back in side when there was nothing to run from. She was not wanting anybody to find out about what she said about Otis Amber when everyone says the same about him.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    At the beginning of the documentary, I thought Willingham was guilty but at the end of the documentary, I wasn't very sure because of what Dr. Hurst's findings. However, Willingham acted like nothing had happened after losing his three children, showing no remorse and no burns on his feet. But, when Dr. Hurst said that Willingham started doing the drugs, or stealing things when he was younger but I don't think that is unusual because most teenagers would do the same thing. It doesn't prove him that he was a really bad guy, but yet his ex-wife said that he abused Stacy. According to Stacy, I thought it was strange when she insisted that Willingham was guilty of killing the children of their.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monster is the tale around a 16 year old dark kid named Steve Harmon from Harlem. Steve is on trial for a being a conceivable accessory to a murder. The book starts with him in prison sitting tight for his trial to begin. The story is composed in screenplay organize, because of Steve's energy for filmmaking, alongside Steve's diary composing which he does even in the court. Steve composes along these lines to keep his rational soundness while being in jail amid the trial.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Burke being innocent makes sense when they say nine year-olds are not complicated enough for murder but when you look at the facts he is obviously guilty. He was one of the the three people that could have killed Jon Benet in the house (Nikki Swift). Jon Benet did not kill herself so either Burke killed her or the parents killed her. In addition, while at one point it might have been true that Burke did not do the crime the evidence shows that he is most definitely guilty. Burke Ramsey’s behavioral issues had a big role in the murder (CNN, 2013).…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gloria was murdered by Jimmy Wayne Glenn on May 1, 1973. The reasons why it’s him is because he saw Gloria the night before, Gloria knew her killer, and investigators found a palm print in the bathroom that matched Glenn’s. Gloria Carpenter was strangled at neck and was killed by Jimmy Wayne Glenn. The first reason why Jimmy Wayne Glen had to be Gloria’s murderer was because he actually saw her the night before she died.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There comes a time in everyone 's life where they have been wronged by another person. Whether it was someone stealing another your lunch out of the company fridge or finding out your lover has been carrying out an affair behind there back, it is human nature to want to seek revenge. However, taking the highroad and turning the other cheek is the moral thing to do. What if someone killed your only child would that change anything on the matter? In the short story titled “Killings”, author Andre Dubus reflects the desire to seek revenge by appealing to the readers ethics, emotions, and by creating tension throughout the story.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Academic degrees are a lifetime honor. Once you have one, no one can take that away from you.” That’s what my father and several academic advisors told me as I contemplated seeking my undergraduate university degree several years ago. Yet some of America’s best colleges and universities are putting political correctness ahead of traditional academic policy by stripping the once-popular TV comedian Bill Cosby of his honorary degrees, in response to allegations that Cosby sexually assaulted numerous women.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Twenty five years to life in prison is what's facing Steve Harmon who is a 16 year old boy who is being accused of murder. Harmon is scared for his life. Steve has to deal with both the trial and the disgusting surrounding around him. Steve's journal writings aren't working so he begins a screenplay of his experience. Trial begins and things start to heat up when witnesses come forward such as Richard "Bobo" Evans, James King's cousin Dr.James, He medical examiner Mr.Sawicki Steve's teacher Dorothy Moore and Osvaldo…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I started the play thinking the boy was guilty. As all of the facts were presented, they definitely pointed to the boy being guilty of murdering his father. At the beginning when the eighth juror voted innocent just because there could be possibilities that one of the facts against him may not be true, like there being a different knife or his knife falling out of his pocket as an example, I agreed with the rest of the jurors because there being a possibility that any of the facts were wrong did not seem probable. I agreed with the eighth juror in discussing the case before jumping to conclusions since a guilty verdict would require the boy to be put to death. I feel as though my thought of guilty started shifting when the jurors took the…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legal guilt should take precedence over factual guilt because legal guilt is considered as a more extensive arrangement of components that identify with a crime that wouldn't be viewed as factual guilt. Legal guilt depends on rule of law which makes all the more including rules that can quantify one's guiltiness. When intending to understand the root of the Canadian Criminal Justice system, it’s important to understand the difference between legal guilt and factual guilt. Briefly explaining what each of these laws mean starting with legal guilt the defendant has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are criminally responsible by providing enough evidence whereas factual guilt is understanding if the defendant has actually committed the crime or not. Saretzky’s case covers both factual and legal guilt however due to the confessions that Mr.Saretzky has made, legal guilt should be a priority because there’s enough evidence to his criminality.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’m juror #11. I’m a refugee from Europe. I went through a lot of injustice so basically I’m looking for be on quest of justice to help other people who have been treated unfairly. The purpose of me writing this letter is to inform that all the jurors decided “not guilty” because it is a hung jury. We end up not having a right verdict to make up a better decision.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays