Nowadays societies are very judgmental about the ideas you print into a document. Resulting in our thinking that our writing is not going to get approved by the judging community. However we are sometimes better writers than how critics say we are. Developing ideas is easy; printing it into your document is the hard part. Before we type them, our head goes crazy due to what the people could say about this document. If critics say it is not formal enough or your writing is bad and eventually you will believe it. Thanks to the bad critics and the hateful comments one gets disappointed about his “bad writing” thinking it is not sufficient. There is no bad writing if you describe emotions, feelings, experiences and thoughts in a document. If you
…show more content…
This will be my primary research. As a secondary research, a survey will be created in order to know different points of view between a group of FYC students. Additionally ask them about their college experiences and if they have been identified with it. To have success in my research I will prove that “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394) misconception by handing out some very tight and emotion full sentences with some grammatical mistakes and hear what FYC teachers have to say about it. When they give me a reasonable opinion, I will question them why do they affirm that “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394) if previously they said the opposite in order to make them think about their everyday lessons and how they will correct this …show more content…
They are so helpful due to the fact that your perspective of writing or your misconceptions clear themselves by letting you know that you are not the only one passing through bad feedback, “bad writing”, and the famous phrase, “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394). Articles like these bring support to students, making them less vulnerable to mean comments by helping them improve their writing by various methods. One is the famous “PQP – Praise Question Polish” (Gloria A. Neubert and Sally J. McNelis, 1896, “Improving Writing in the Disciplines”, Educational Leadership 43.7: 54-58). Making students help each other in a more successful and professional
This will be my primary research. As a secondary research, a survey will be created in order to know different points of view between a group of FYC students. Additionally ask them about their college experiences and if they have been identified with it. To have success in my research I will prove that “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394) misconception by handing out some very tight and emotion full sentences with some grammatical mistakes and hear what FYC teachers have to say about it. When they give me a reasonable opinion, I will question them why do they affirm that “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394) if previously they said the opposite in order to make them think about their everyday lessons and how they will correct this …show more content…
They are so helpful due to the fact that your perspective of writing or your misconceptions clear themselves by letting you know that you are not the only one passing through bad feedback, “bad writing”, and the famous phrase, “if sentences aren’t grammatically “correct,” they aren’t useful” (Rose 394). Articles like these bring support to students, making them less vulnerable to mean comments by helping them improve their writing by various methods. One is the famous “PQP – Praise Question Polish” (Gloria A. Neubert and Sally J. McNelis, 1896, “Improving Writing in the Disciplines”, Educational Leadership 43.7: 54-58). Making students help each other in a more successful and professional