Margaret Fuller And Whitman Analysis

Superior Essays
During Margaret Fuller's and Walt Whitman's era, stereotypes and laws were restricting people to reach their full potential. Sadly till this day, society seems to have the need to place unspoken rules on people. These rules classify what the meaning of success is, how one should physically look, dress, and act. These set of unspoken rules have stripped people from their individualism. Furthermore, these rules have also limited women on who they can become and what they can do. People are consumed by the fear of being rejected and becoming an outcast. Fearing in being rejected, these individuals resort to following others and meet societies standards. Being suppressed by societies rules, an individual would never get the chance to see what …show more content…
Both Fuller and Whitman wanted to break these barriers. They wanted to open the eyes of the people and make them see that they had no reason in following these rules. Men were not only meant to bring a pay check home. Women were not meant to only look pretty and keep the house clean. People were not meant to follow the ideas of others. Each person has a mind of their own and each person has their own thoughts. Everyone was meant to have their own ambitions. Margaret Fuller urged women to seek a greater meaning in life. She specified how women were able to gain independence from their family and home through education. As the reader is able to see, Fuller stood as a great example on how education can a give a woman independence. Scorning the idea that women should accept that their only future was to be a housewife. Fuller desired that women be allowed to fulfill their personal potential in whatever they dreamed of. Such as Fuller was praised and criticized for rebelling against the traditional views, so was Walt Whitman. He was able to see the beauty of individualism and encouraged everyone to follow their own path. Many critics assumed if all mankind were to follow their own path it would lead to destruction. They wanted to confine everyone by the rules of society. What is so great about being like everyone else? Society should not outcast a person who is different, but …show more content…
In some way, both authors come hand in hand to share some similar point of views. Individuals should come to understand that everyone is equal and have the right to follow their own path. Every single action a human does should not be explicit to please others or to gain the approval of society. One's opinion or action can help change the world for better, yet if one keeps it bottled up then who will hear it. To give to society one shall go out into the crowd and voice their thoughts, just as Fuller and Whitman believed and did. Being different or having different opinions should not discourage someone. On the contrary, sharing your beliefs, opinions, and way of life should be motivated because it will help one and others to move forward. "[Be] ... true to [oneself], even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur [one's] own abhorrence" (Frederick Douglass). As Fuller expressed everyone is equal and everyone should be given the same opportunities. There will always be people to suppress one, however these people should only motivate one to continue fighting. In the end, it is one's own vision of themselves that matters

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The cult of domesticity has rendered women complacent, they have become slaves of societal norms. Wollstonecraft believes that women must emancipate themselves from the restraints that society and culture have placed upon them. Women have gotten too complacent, they have lost their conviction and settled for what is given to them. Wollstonecraft asserts that a woman “must not be dependent” (662) on a man for her livelihood. Wollstonecraft believes that women must, in order to break the shackles that society and culture have placed upon them, go beyond the home.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    129) If we look at these problems from the communitarian way, you eliminate the shortcomings of simply choosing for an individual or addressing only maximizing the welfare of a choice. That is what is taking place right now. If you have a different opinion than myself, you somehow feel you have the right to interject what I am doing instead of ignoring me, and letting me go on my way. You need to look at the community as a whole, and decide what is in their best interest, not in one individual. By doing this you provide freedom, but in a sense that is the right decision for everyone, or at least what should be best for everyone.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This would be agreed to from the original position because someone who is unaware of any features of their life would want to be given equal rights for all situations they could be born into. The second principle, the difference principle, is more complex. Rawls argues that because all members of a society cooperate to gain advantages for the society as a whole, those in the original position would not find it fair for some members of society to struggle so that more fortunate members may prosper. Instead however, the advances of those well off in society should lead to improvements in the lives of all members of society, since all members of society have to cooperate to make the advancements possible. This logic leads to the second principle which states that social or economic inequalities within society are justifiable only when they create benefits for all members of society, specifically those who are disadvantaged.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When they will not, they are shunned by society and considered mad. In this culture where women have no control over their lives, the least they can do is have control over their own minds and opinions. In fact, Dickinson seems to be encouraging women to buck societal expectations when she says “To a discerning Eye — / Much sense — the starkest Madness — “(620), as if it is crazy to try to adhere to the guidelines of society, and that it makes more sense to allow people to think them…

    • 1556 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is popular in the present day because there is a belief that everyone should be tolerant towards others ' beliefs and views; this idea for freedom of speech implies that there are no ‘real’ absolute truths. Social worker believe that all human circumstances are different and therefore there is a need to have different moral rules for people. Relativism allows for the diversity that is present in the world, it understands that life is not black and white and that cultures may believe that their practice is more justifiable than other cultural practice, but by using relativist approach. This will allow for acceptance between different peoples. Many social workers like using the ethical relativism theory because it justifies a lot of the decision making process.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Unfortunately only rights have been learnt by the learners, and they seem to have forgotten to learn about their duties. And hence problems seem to have been appearing in the society. As a woman less educated or illiterate they didn’t know the world beyond their husband, house hold duties and familial responsibilities. But as the time changed the so called image of women has been broken. Because of the education women become aware of their own rights, desires, ambitions, needs.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a human, we have the right to make the choices for ourselves without anyone’s interference. Thus this right cannot be violated by anyone beside yourself when it comes to making the decision. According to the novel The Cosmopolitanism Reader by Garret W. Brown and David Held, “one should always behave so as to treat with equal respect the dignity of reason and moral choice in every human being.” Reasoning and moral choice is what makes every human being seems unique if they know how to use it properly. Though some people know how to use it properly, there still a chance of having that decision turned against their own will if they don’t know what their human rights are. Human rights are somewhat limited to some places that you can’t speak up your mind freely and feel free to do what you…

    • 1591 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a democracy, the goal is to create an environment that fairly treats all people living under that governance. Guibernau states, “in the global age all democratic nationalisms ought to incorporate a further dimension to their traditional values. Their concern for the nation and fellow nationals should be accompanied by a clear commitment to the cosmopolitanism values of social justice, freedom and dialogic democracy” (p. 15). Cosmopolitanisms isn’t the belief that all nations should not recognise their autonomy and get rid of their traditions and beliefs. Instead they should all strive to recognise that there isn’t one single form of living.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would strive for happiness for themselves, and for the democracy as a whole. Tocqueville thought for a successful democracy, citizens must keep the greater good in line with their own interest. They would keep in mind of their actions, if they would be beneficial to themselves as an individual, and to society as a whole. Mill and Tocqueville both agreed with the notion of individualism, and allowing individuals to think, and to form opinions, and to carry out their opinions without hindrance from anyone. They both advocated for individual freedom and expression.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So the standards of the law, rights and liberties would all be equal to all, no matter their stance in society. With equality there around a society there should also be no inbuilt hate, either political, race, or social wise. In a society where everyone is not required to be inheritably equal there are going to be discrepancies between each class but they should still have the possibilities of moving up in the society. Since there are many ways that one can fall into terrible situations, it would be the job of the government to try to help and maintain this equality even if it is just for a short period. Things such as welfare and food stamps would be supplied but with conditions.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays