Stephen G. Pott's Nine Consequences

Improved Essays
Stephen G. Potts, author, writes his article “Looking for the Exit Door: Killing and Caring in Modern Medicine” to show his readers the nine consequences that he believes will arise if euthanasia is institutionalized, or legal, in the United States. Potts’ style of writing is different most other philosophical writers in the sense that he backs up his opinion on euthanasia by explaining his nine consequences and further elaborating them by examining scenarios that are applicable to the real world. From reading Potts’ article it is easy to understand from a legality standpoint Potts believes that his nine bad consequences are bad enough to outweigh any good that may come from euthanasia, so it should not be institutionalized. Before reading this article I was a firm believer that euthanasia should absolutely be institutionalized, however, after reading and dissecting all of Potts’ many good points I began to question whether or not euthanasia really is beneficial. After careful thought and consideration, I would have to disagree with Potts’ simply because his consequences are too easily argued and even potentially pointless. The first of Potts’ nine consequences is if euthanasia is legalized the medical community will have a “reduced pressure to …show more content…
This statement is plausible, however, I think that people will not actually be afraid of visiting hospitals due to the euthanasia performed, these few people will just use euthanasia as a further excuse to stay away from hospitals. Euthanasia will not add to the irrational fear; it will only create another excuse for those who are afraid to not see a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alternatives to euthanasia can prevent putting too much power in other hands, and eliminate consequences in the future; therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized. Through the legalization of Euthanasia we will eventually enter a “slippery slope”. One of the biggest concerns with euthanasia is when to cross the line at who can receive euthanasia. As euthanasia progresses more laws and rules are being set to allow more people to receive euthanasia.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will summarize James Rachel’s argument on active versus euthanasia, and explain the examples he has written about to further explain it. After that I will summarize Thomas Sullivan’s objection. And at the end I will state my stance and conclusion on the subject. Rachels argument is on the difference between active and passive euthanasia and if that is really a distinction that needs to be made. He states in his introduction that active euthanasia is never allowed but passive euthanasia is sometimes allowed.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well-known writer, Annabelle Gurwitch, in her article, Death Without Dignity, describes the effects of allowing euthanasia in all states of the United States. Euthanasia is not accepted in all states as of today. Physician aid in dying, or assisted suicide, is legal in the states of Vermont, Oregon, Montana, and Washington. The key difference between euthanasia and physician aid in dying is who administers the lethal dose of medication. Gurwitch’s purpose of this article is to persuade her readers to the benefits of allowing euthanasia and to encourage them to make this a “normal” way of leaving this world.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this reference provides a substantial framework for study, it lacks the in-depth comparisons between the modern era approach to euthanasia and the historical past before the 1800?s. It also lacks discussion on the cultural pressures not to document the benefits…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia In Canada

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introduction Is legalizing Euthanasia immoral? Unethical? Should it even be a topic of discussion? Jack Kevorkian a famous physician believes that euthanasia should be legalized as he states “dying is not a crime”. A big body of the Government of Canada would also approve euthanasia being legalized.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been a lot of debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide or PSA/E is morally permissible. This paper will cover both physician assisted suicide and euthanasia, which has not normally been argued in one discussion. This paper will argue that PSA/E is morally permissible and will include the most prominent objections also. Topics covered will include quality of life and individual rights, and the correct use of physician assisted-suicide. The utilitarian argument of less suffering and comparing the euthanization of animals to the euthanization of humans will also be discussed.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America, the legality of physician-assisted suicide or “Active Euthanasia” has been the topic of a highly debated political controversy. Whether there is a morally relevant difference between “Active Euthanasia” and “Passive Euthanasia”, or more simply between doing and allowing harm is at the center of this dispute. Two American philosophers, James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock share their outlooks on the topic in their essays Active and Passive Euthanasia (1975) and The Intentional Termination of Life (1979). Steinbock argues that Rachels has misinterpreted the standard view on the subject, or the view in which the American Medical Association has published, and refutes Rachel 's conclusion. However, Rachel 's provides…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, should not be an option for patients. Euthanasia could open up an opportunity for patients with non-critical illnesses who are suffering from depression or other mental health illnesses to commit suicide. It also could create an opportunity for the population who needs protection the most to be taken advantage of. Additionally, the practice of euthanasia can open the door to hopelessness for doctors and families and keep them from looking for life-saving or prolonging measures. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the practice of euthanasia reduces the value of human life by allowing it to become a byproduct of humans instead of remaining something to be determined by the laws of nature.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays