After stem cell shots in their Eyes, three patients in Florida lose vision (2017)
1. Why would the U.S Stem Cell company use fat stem cells instead of undifferentiated stem cells? This is kind of a trick question; Stem cell therapy is still a new field of treatment. With that being, said stem cell therapy is very limited as to what it can treat.
2. In Term of treatment, the stem cell therapy was more detrimental to their eyes, which ultimately caused blindness. However, what lead to the vison loss also was stem cell therapy the proper treatment?
No, the women who sought treatment at the stem cell company had muscular degeneration of the eye; which means the eye is slowly detaching from orbit cavity. Atrophy of the eye can be corrected …show more content…
What was the initial problem within the clinical trials at Florida? How does this relate to increased risk factor to those who participate in things of this nature?
To put it simply it was the improper treatment the women had muscular degeneration of the eye. The problem was they were seeking regenerative which in nonprofessional terms means some kind of medical miracle that simple does not exist yet. As a result, this increased risk factor for those who participated in the trial because the promise of a medical miracle made them more susceptible it be conned.
4. How was the Stem Cell Company able to conduct these highly unethical but surprisingly semi-legal clinical trials?
The answer to this primarily lies within the legal litigation and regulations through the FDA. One reason the stem company was able practice is due to a gray area. For example, if they originated from patients then they do need the FDA’s Approval to use. Another reason is that as it stated in the paper clinical trials do not need government approval.
5. What lead into the investigation of the stem cell company?
The investigation began within sillimar cases of the effects of stem cell therapy which had navigate affects the patient’s eyes. After which the FDA was later notified of the clinical
1. Why would the U.S Stem Cell company use fat stem cells instead of undifferentiated stem cells? This is kind of a trick question; Stem cell therapy is still a new field of treatment. With that being, said stem cell therapy is very limited as to what it can treat.
2. In Term of treatment, the stem cell therapy was more detrimental to their eyes, which ultimately caused blindness. However, what lead to the vison loss also was stem cell therapy the proper treatment?
No, the women who sought treatment at the stem cell company had muscular degeneration of the eye; which means the eye is slowly detaching from orbit cavity. Atrophy of the eye can be corrected …show more content…
What was the initial problem within the clinical trials at Florida? How does this relate to increased risk factor to those who participate in things of this nature?
To put it simply it was the improper treatment the women had muscular degeneration of the eye. The problem was they were seeking regenerative which in nonprofessional terms means some kind of medical miracle that simple does not exist yet. As a result, this increased risk factor for those who participated in the trial because the promise of a medical miracle made them more susceptible it be conned.
4. How was the Stem Cell Company able to conduct these highly unethical but surprisingly semi-legal clinical trials?
The answer to this primarily lies within the legal litigation and regulations through the FDA. One reason the stem company was able practice is due to a gray area. For example, if they originated from patients then they do need the FDA’s Approval to use. Another reason is that as it stated in the paper clinical trials do not need government approval.
5. What lead into the investigation of the stem cell company?
The investigation began within sillimar cases of the effects of stem cell therapy which had navigate affects the patient’s eyes. After which the FDA was later notified of the clinical