Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Beginning in the mid twentieth century, embryonic stem cell research has gradually evolved into a paramount and controversial issue in American society. The practice includes the inherent destruction of human embryos for the harvest of stem cells that are used in medical science to treat patients and regenerate body tissues. This murder of innocent human life acts as the underlying spark for the controversial debate. Politicians and leaders have continuously argued over the issue for decades, each taking a different standpoint. Some regard embryos as simply a group of cells, and therefore the destruction of them is acceptable. They believe that the medical benefits of the research outweigh the genocide of embryos. However, other pro-life advocates …show more content…
Christians and other religious peoples across the world argue against embryonic stem cell research because of their views on conception. Believing that all life begins at the exact moment that a sperm fertilizes an egg, they regard embryos as distinct human beings and therefore only support adult stem cell research. Nancy Jones, an associate professor of pathology at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, writes, “The fact that Jesus became a human being at the moment of conception reinforces that all human stages have inherent value” (qtd. in Clemmitt). Although they are at early developmental stages compared to other human life, they should still receive the respect and honor that adult human beings receive (George and Lee 66). There is no reason that embryos should be massacred in embryonic stem cell research, as they harness the ability to later develop into an adult human …show more content…
The killing of embryos is simply genocide, unnervingly similar to Hitler’s murder of the Jewish people during World War II (Dudley). Humanitarian and moral standards forbid this killing of innocent human life. For Christians and other religious peoples, teachings of the Bible provide clear evidence against the murder of embryos in embryonic stem cell research. Throughout the entire religious writing, there is no lesson that shows that God would approve of the death of embryos, or children, for the purpose of curing disease. God is always shown protecting children, not sacrificing them (“What is the Christian View”). Jesus said, “Let the children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven” in Matthew 19:14 (“What is the Christian View”). In Exodus 2:1-10, God protected baby Moses, even though it resulted in actions and harm against him. Furthermore, in 2 Samuel 12: 15-19, the son of Bathsheba and David died as punishment, not an innocent murder (“What is the Christian View”). God would have never approved of embryonic stem cell research; therefore, it should not be practiced in our

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Christopher Smith's article "Perils and Promise: Destroy an Embryo, Waste a Life", expresses how embryonic stem cell research is not beneficial in any way. If you kill an embryo to save someone else, there is no impact. In fact, the result is neutralized. Although here may be groups of human beings who support embryonic stem cell research, the idea itself surpasses the rules and regulations established in a functional society. The morals and ethics obtained by many people may be rearranged by which human beings may eventually dissocialize.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a big question about the ethics evaluation that researchers must do. Even if the embryos used for research have been fertilized for research purposes or are aborted fetuses, they are still human lives that will be disposed of when they have served their purpose. This is why religious groups, moral activists, and the government are opposed to stem cell research,…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book touches on ethical, religious, as well as technical discourse in the stem cell research debate. It mentions commonplaces within our society and religious views of human embryos. Some common enthymemes that both sides use to support themselves are also stated. Most of the arguments for and against stem cell research in this article use induction to argue their points, moving from one very specific situation to generalities. As the article concludes, it uses positive future tense to describe where stem cell research is going in the future, another rhetorical…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of most stem cell research is executed is with the use of an embryo. According to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (ALS), “embryonic stem cells can be isolated from fertilized embryos less than a week old.” This process has caused some controversy throughout world and many have chosen not to support stem cell research because of this fact. Many people are disturbed by this because the researchers create a human life from an egg and sperm cell to create an embryo and then use the embryo for the stem cells only, then rid of the embryo all together. One would believe that this is murder because of the destruction and death of an early but yet still live embryo.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine being diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, having to gain symptoms that range from speech problems, cognitive impairment, bowel and bladder difficulties, and difficulty with coordination. After going to the doctors’ for a few years, they decide to try a kind of medical science. They take a few skin cells from one of your appendages and with the help of microscopic technology, they transfer your nucleus into a donor egg that had its own nucleus removed. Then, a type of stimulation allows your nucleus to start dividing, creating new cells with only your DNA. With these new embryonic stem cells, they would lead to the cells that have caused your brain to deteriorate and restore your brain’s capability of functioning well again.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scientist are seeking the benefit of other people's wrongdoing. Using aborted fetuses for stem cell research is benefit of other people's…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Embryonic Stem Cells are Essential The question that many scientists who are involved in embryonic stem cell research are facing is, which is more valuable? The life of a human suffering from a potentially deadly disease, or the life of human at one week of growth? Let first define what an embryonic stem cell is. Embryonic stem cells, they are resulting from “blastocyst stage embryos that develop in culture and are capable to indefinite expansion in vitro”.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When I started to think of embryo research and how I felt about it I began to feel unsure. I am unsure if I am against embryo research, but I am against destroying an embryo. I do feel doing researching on embryo’s could be beneficial for possible medical advantages, medical treatments for disorders such as down-syndrome and could help teach us to understand why doing embryo research could be a benefit. Though there are benefits to embryo research I am fully against destroying them. Though embryos are not a human life, yet it can be.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most debated topics in science is the use embryonic stem cells in scientific research. The ethical debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research comes down to two core values that we want to uphold: the alleviation of human suffering and preserving the inherent value of human life. Embryonic stem cell research is such a tricky topic because it requires us to choose between these two core values. We cannot uphold both values because the alleviation of suffering in this case is accomplished by the destruction of a human embryo, which would normally have the potential to develop into a new individual. Thus, we must fully examine both sides of the argument in order to understand the ethical implications of this issue.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a world where a small group of people could destroy a nation-wide organization with slanderous lies. If the Republicans in Congress get their way, Americans wouldn’t have to imagine. Defunding the Planned Parenthood Federation of America over a false accusation would be harmful to the health and finances of American citizens. Planned Parenthood is an organization that provides many essential health services for both men and women. Not only do these services directly benefit millions of people, but the scientific advancements made possible by Planned Parenthood have improved the lives of many more.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research. Google this term and you will find that there are as many articles on the ethics of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) as there are on the actual biomedical field of study. The moral claims for and against the use of embryos in scientific research often deal with “personhood”. Opponents of ESCR mistakenly equate ‘human life’ and ‘personhood’. I will dive into the semantics of these terms in the following paragraph.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By comparing the process of embryonic stem cell research to that of adult stem cell research, it is shown that adult stem cell research is considered more right than embryonic stem cell research because adult stem cell research doesn’t cause harm to embryos, as compared to embryonic stem cell research. The fact that adult stem cell research doesn’t cause harm to embryos is reason enough for the majority of the public to support adult stem cell research, rather than embryonic stem cell research. Additionally, William Saunders states that “...the production of human beings for the sake of experimentation, research, or the harvesting of organs is morally wrong. Human beings are not disposable biological material.” (Saunders 2).…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is to say, an embryo has interests and rights that must be respected by donors. Health practitioners, in the biotechnology field in general and medical laboratory science field particularly, are constantly under fire for ethical issues. Therefore, it poses a great challenge to innovate new solutions to combat the need to destroy an embryo for stem cell research and serves as motivation for scientists to think…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cell Research Argument

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The public’s opinion on stem cell research has drastically changed from when the controversy first got major media coverage in 2001. According to a poll posted to isidewith.com, 73 percent of Americans agree the federal government should fund stem cell research, while 27 percent think the contrary. But why has public perception taken a complete and utter turnaround from years ago? One may argue, positives of stem cells outweigh the negatives. Today, we have a better understanding of what these cells are capable of.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scientist have just scratched the surface on stem cell research. It is a complicated subject that still has a ways to go. So what is the point of stem cell research. The point is if we master this science, then it can help a lot of people. “Stem cells are cells that have the ability to reproduce themselves and to give rise to other more specialized types of cells” (NIH Director 's Statement on Research Using Stem Cells).…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays