Steinberg And Elizabeth Scott Case Analysis

Improved Essays
Laurence Steinberg and Elizabeth S. Scott analyze issues surrounding the criminal accountability and the execution of young people. Under standards of criminal cases, accountability is diminished when the person's ability to have good judgment is minimized, when the illegal action was compelled, or when the action was uncalled-for. Another point that Steinberg and Scott present support for is that young people should not be held to the equivalent measures of criminal accountability as adults, since juveniles' ability to have good judgement is minimized, they are less apt to withstand forcible influence, and their personality is still going through development. Lastly, Steinberg and Scott argue that the uniqueness of adolescence as a diminishing

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In additional to conflicting views due to diversity among the North and South, Stephan Douglas’ desire to develop unorganized territory, and disinterest in the controversy of slavery, lead to influential conflicts in the sectional crisis, including the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Lecompton Constitution. These conflicts, and the additional uprising they caused further divided the country, leading the country towards sectionalism. At the time, senator of Illinois Stephan Douglas worked toward developing westward territories. Through the late 1840s and early 1850s Douglas aspired to develop and build a railroad on the remaining land from the Louisiana purchase (306). Douglas’ lack of investment in the issue of slavery lead to his support of…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason why juveniles should not receive life in prison without parole is the undeveloped thinking process that occurs. This is further explored in the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” by Paul Thompson, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the article, Thompson focuses on the cognitive development of the juvenile brain and compares it with the brain of a full grown adult. He uses an example of a juvenile being tried as an adult for second-degree murder to point out how when questioned, the juvenile was unable to give a reason for his actions. He then reports on findings about the teenage brain that he and his research team had discovered.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Juveniles Be Sentenced to Life Without Parole? When adults commit crimes, they are held accountable; but what if a teenager or child commits the same crime? On June 25, 2012, a controversy heated in the Supreme Court between the majority and 4 judges. The majority of the judges believes that it shouldn’t be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole when they commit a heinous crime such as murder, while the other 4 judges oppose to that, saying it should be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Others may argue that it’s not right because there are laws that prohibit youngsters to complete certain actions like smoking, drinking, or going to R movies, these actions don’t seem to affect other it might affect them, however, once they commit a horrifying crime they are being tried as adults. In addition, Lundstrom argues that “Today we are witness to criminal defendants facing a life sentence without parole…” (Lundstrom, 10). Lundstrom continues by stating that juveniles cannot shave and still play with toys also they act scenes from their favorite T.V. shows. Further information that researchers have studies on teen brains with technology that maps the patterns of brain growth in children and teenagers, has given information that indicate that teenagers are having a massive loss of brain tissue this scientific evidence has also sparked the opponents, and argue that this evidence is why juveniles should not be facing life sentence in prison without parole.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the age accountability, Heft said that they are not old enough to be responsible for their actions. They are still viewed as children under the law and by the American society that they live in. While Smith argues that it is very unrealistic to assume that all persons that belong in a certain age group share the same degree of immaturity. The maturity is a factor that varies from individual to individual so they have to be treated like adults and be responsible for their violent actions. Heft and Smith’s points are realistic and well developed but leave the reader in the middle on this situation as undecided on the matter.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are always individuals whom do not believe that juveniles should be tried as adults. In an experiment with mock jurors, “younger defendants were perceived as less accountable and less competent” (Semple and Woody 302). Also in the experiment of Semple and Woody, the defendant’s age did not affect conviction judgements; younger defendants’ were given a shorter sentence than the older defendants’ (302). Even though they see that the person committed the crime they do not want to give the same long term consequences’. Also in Semple and Woody’s study, the severity of the crime was also taking into account for the juvenile offenders (302).…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adult Prisons

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adolescents, the age in which young people are still building up their reasoning and are most abnormal among all ages. While other Western nations rarely convict minors as adults, the rate of teenagers receives adult sentence in the United States is quite high compared to other countries. This creates two different opinions about the issue. One side argues that juvenile should not be charged as an adult no matter what crime juveniles commit. The other side, however, disagrees as they insist that teenagers, at such a young age, can commit such serious crime should be convicted like an adult because they are dangerous for our society, especially when once they grow up.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this Article, we contend that a formative model of adolescent wrongdoing direction grounded in logical information about youthfulness is both more attractive to youthful guilty parties and more inclined to advance social welfare than an administration that neglects to go to formative research. We challenge the correctional reformers who have assumed that open well-being is upgraded and social welfare advanced if genuine adolescent wrongdoers are rebuffed as grown-ups, and who have been unconcerned about whether their approach is good with standards of reasonable discipline. We concentrate here fundamentally on the social welfare contention for a different and more tolerant adolescent equity framework grounded in a formative system. To start…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    teens between the years 1990 and 2010 are being discussed and there is a dramatic increase by two hundred and thirty percent. With further analysis I discovered that among these teens, thirty five percent of the teens charged as adults were likely to return to prison vs those whom were sentenced as juveniles. That means that among the teens who were sentenced as adults, sixty five percent of them (more than half) never went back to jail because they learned from their lesson. Although these number may be approximations and based on the matter that they were even let out, a vast majority who serve life would have been safe for society. One cannot take the risk of letting out a criminal who may still have bad intentions free into our society.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequences Of Juvenile Crimes

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Today, more youths are involved in gangs, murders, and assaults than history has shown. So, if these children are capable of committing adult crimes, shouldn’t they face adult consequences? It seems that the severity of juvenile crime has risen so much, that it is hard to distinct it from adult crimes. On the other hand, most adult offenders we find today, who commit murder or assault are not first time offenders. The unfortunate thing is that a survey given by the Pretrial Services Resource Center found that an astonishing number of juveniles in adult facilities were charged with nonviolent crimes (ABCNews.com: Juveniles in Adult Jails.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults for it is wrong to hold adolescents, under the legal age, to adult standards. If children do not even receive the same rights as adults in the first place, it makes no sense to try them in adult court. These juveniles should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated in a positive manner, for they tend to come from troubled households and violent neighborhoods. In over half of the cases these troubled kids don’t know any different way than a life of crime when surrounded by both social and environmental factors that influence their delinquent actions. One must commemorate that juveniles are mentally underdeveloped, and still have time to innovate if their issues are dealt with precisely and accurately.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays