An agency’s judicial review provisions and procedures for adjudication are often laid out in an enabling statute and Congress defines the agency’s actions and determines how their actions may be challenged. The determination of whether it is constitutional for an agency to replace the meaning of the Supreme Court with its own reading of the statute is often questioned. The Supreme Court may apply rules of statutory interpretation to the agency. The statutory interpretation is a process in which the court must determine how a statute should be enforced and then requires a statutory construction. With that being said, it is not constitutional for an agency to supplant the interpretation of the Supreme Court unless there are certain circumstances
