The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sebu and the Seated Statue of Gudea:
Compare and Contrast
While art can be different in form, medium, purpose, content and other attributes, similarities can also be drawn when comparing multiple pieces to each other. The statues of The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sub and the Seated Statue of Gudea share many similarities as well as differences. Analyzing these attributes together will give an insight into each piece.
Each statue individually gives an insight into when and why it was made. The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu was created in Egypt during Dynasty 4 (2575-2465 B.C.) while the Seated Statue of Gudea was created roughly 500 years later (2090 B.C.) in Mesopotamia (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). Royal Acquaintances features a pair statue, most likely a married couple, and was created to adorn a tomb and had a spiritual context (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). The Statue of Gudea, however, was commissioned and created while the ruler was alive to glorify and represent his own good works for the community in a more political context (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). The use of color is another difference between the two statues. Royal Acquaintances was painted a light color, while Gudea was left in its dark stone …show more content…
The composition was similar in that both are three-dimensional statues. Both use the same use of lines and shapes to create images of realistic people. Both include inscriptions carved into them. Both were created on a scale smaller than actual size. The medium used for both sculptures was stone. Considering the similar medium, both also have a smooth texture to represent the skin of the subjects. All subjects were represented in living form and had looks of calm and content on their faces and in their postures. Further similarities could be found upon closer observations of the
Compare and Contrast
While art can be different in form, medium, purpose, content and other attributes, similarities can also be drawn when comparing multiple pieces to each other. The statues of The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sub and the Seated Statue of Gudea share many similarities as well as differences. Analyzing these attributes together will give an insight into each piece.
Each statue individually gives an insight into when and why it was made. The Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu was created in Egypt during Dynasty 4 (2575-2465 B.C.) while the Seated Statue of Gudea was created roughly 500 years later (2090 B.C.) in Mesopotamia (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). Royal Acquaintances features a pair statue, most likely a married couple, and was created to adorn a tomb and had a spiritual context (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). The Statue of Gudea, however, was commissioned and created while the ruler was alive to glorify and represent his own good works for the community in a more political context (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016). The use of color is another difference between the two statues. Royal Acquaintances was painted a light color, while Gudea was left in its dark stone …show more content…
The composition was similar in that both are three-dimensional statues. Both use the same use of lines and shapes to create images of realistic people. Both include inscriptions carved into them. Both were created on a scale smaller than actual size. The medium used for both sculptures was stone. Considering the similar medium, both also have a smooth texture to represent the skin of the subjects. All subjects were represented in living form and had looks of calm and content on their faces and in their postures. Further similarities could be found upon closer observations of the