When at trial the prosecutor was able to show that the harassment of Ms. Arnold started when the two meet in college during the year of 1998 with Mr. Evans asking the victim to allow him to take photos of her bare feet and legs (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassing activity continued to the phone that Ms. Arnolds parents attempted to protect their daughter from Mr. Evans phone calls and even visits to her home. During the incident that took place when Ms. …show more content…
Evans was convicted of and the details of the statue to determine is the criminal conviction was unconstitutional (Brody and Acker, 2010). The court looked at the aspects of the statue such as the its requirement of placing a reasonable person in fear of bodily injury or greater fear (Brody and Acker, 2010). The court showed that in this case that the victim and the prosecution could show that Mr. Evans conduct supported the criminal conviction. The court up held the criminal conviction given to Mr. Evans for stalking Ms. Arnold, and making him serve the balance of the criminal