The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…
Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…
Furlow, 04-CV-5887 Our File No. 5-987 Statement of Facts: John Brown sued his dentist, Dr. Thomas Furlow, claiming he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was infected. Mr. Brown then went on vacation and while on vacation he passed out due to infection, pain, and the infection spreading. Mr. Brown incurred medical expense and loss of wages. Furlow was served with a complaint on March 1.…
NOW COMES the State of New Hampshire, by and through the Office of the Rockingham County Attorney, and states as follows: 1. The defendant is charged with one count of Possession of a Controlled Drug with Intent to Sell [Principle/Accomplice] and one count of Possession of a Controlled Drug. 2. On June 2, 2016 the State received the defendant’s Motion to Suppress. 3.…
The case being addressed in this essay is: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. D.F.G. The topics being addressed in this essay will be provided through a summary and an analysis, explaining the case through legal liberalism and feminist legal theory in relation to the majority decision and the dissenting decision. I personally, agree with the reasoning of the majority decision and will prove why. Summary…
In 1977 Fusilier v. Russell dealt with intoxicated drivers and the police failure to arrest. The plaintiff brought criminal action against two Louisiana Sheriffs for failure to arrest or restrain an intoxicated driver. The subject had later become involved in a motor vehicle accident that left the victim/plaintiff severely burned. Prior to the accident deputy sheriffs were responding to a call from a nightclub where they were to evict a disorderly customer. When the officers arrived they noticed an intoxicated person in the parking lot.…
In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…
Briggs v. R.W Elliott - South Carolina: In 1951, in Clarendon County, South Carolina, twenty courageous African-American parents filed a lawsuit against school officials, for their own children received unequal education services compared to the all-white schools. In South Carolina, young African-American children had to walk far distances to attend schools. Some students even had to walk an eight-mile distance to school. They were not allowed to travel on school-provided transportation such as normal school buses!…
In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…
The Wolf v Colorado case questions the fourth amendment. The argument was about whether it was against and illegal for the police to search and seizure Wolf’s medical office and obtain daybooks without any warrant. The reason for the unauthorized raid was because a women had called 911 about having medical complications after having had an illegal abortion. She named Wolf as the doctor who performed the procedure and arrested him under the conspiracy to perform an abortion. The information contained in the daybook led to police interrogated other women who had illegal abortions and admitted Dr. Wolf was the one who performed them.…
I would witness the decision making leading to my school newspaper publishing one of the first articles concerning an HIV-positive student. The staff went against the principal’s interpretation of the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case and effectively defined CA Education Code 48907’s shield covering all high school journalists in…
Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…
The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…
There is a controversial issue in regards to whether or not the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Law. The Stark Law is a federal statute which imposing doctors and physicians are not allowed to referrer their patients to facilities in which they have affiliations with. This law was implemented based on the case of Dr. S. and Dr. V., in which they leased a nuclear camera to refrain from sending their patients to another center. I do believe that the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. were a violation of the Stark Law. One of the first violations of Dr. S. and Dr. V. was the decision to lease their own camera without taking inconsideration the impact it would have on the outside parties.…
Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…