Starbucks Solvency Case Essay
Starbuck’s current ratio has increased from 1.29 to 1.83 between 2009 and 2011. At the same time its quick ratio has also increased to a healthy 1.36 percent in 2011. It is clear that current liabilities are decreasing at a faster rate than current assets. Thus the company’s ability to meet its obligations in the short-term should not be a problem. Starbucks’ liquidity looks healthy going forward as it has a healthy receivables turnover at 33.95 in 2011, whilst the average collection period is at 10.75.
The debt to equity ratio dropped from 2010 levels where it was at 0.74 to 0.68 in 2011 which means that there has been a reduction in financial risk and an …show more content…
Up until 2008 Starbucks registered stable growth, growing its ROE from 14.10% in 2003 to 29.81% in 2007. During this same period the return on sales number remained steady around 7%. However it’s ROE plummeted in 2008 to 13.21%, only recovering in 2010 and peaking at 30.91% in 2011. At the same time its return on sales dropped to a record 3% in 2008. The drop in 2008-2009 is partly explained by the economic downturn of 2008. Starbucks situation was certainly not helped by the fact that it had a liquidity problem that had persisted since 2005 with quick and current ratios below 1.0. Starbucks has since seen its short-term liquidity improve with its quick and current ratios recovering in 2010 and 2011 to levels above 1.0. Improved liquidity has also come with improved profitability with the return on sales number peaking at 10.65% in