Nisbett's Theory Of Obedience

Great Essays
Many scientists such as Stanley Milgram, Erich Fromm, Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett have tested their theory of obedience to authority. Their findings might frighten people on how obedient people are and what the sick and twisted things people will do. An example of obedience to authority is the writing of this paper for Doctor Campbell, if not done properly with obedience the grade of the student will plummet. Another example of people listening to orders given by an authoritarian person that inflicted pain, suffering, and even death is the Holocaust; the Holocaust was set up by Adolf Hitler and Nazi officers in concentration camps. The Nazi officers were told to run these concentration camps filled with innocent people and to exterminate …show more content…
Their theory was that most people will do anything they are told, if the order is given by a person in authority or what they perceive as an authoritative figure. The experiments and observations defied morals and common sense. Obedience, a virtue, is giving up of one’s self to another if they are in authority even if it is wrong. Disobedience is a vice and is the not giving up of one’s self, standing up, even in the face of being wrong or ridiculed. Erich Fromm stated in the article “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, “Man continues to evolve by acts of disobedience.” To disobey an order is wrong and to obey is a virtue that man must want and need to survive. He discusses his theory with examples of the Hebrew myth of Adam and Eve living in harmony with the earth until they disobeyed and Prometheus, a Greek myth, stealing fire from the gods, disobeying the order of the gods. There are different varieties of disobedience some being destructive and others being life …show more content…
The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked. Milgram set the illusion in order to stage the revelation of “difficult-to-get-to-truths.” All the participants, whether skilled or unskilled, continued to the level of three hundred volts. Sixty-five percent of the participants, those who were the professionals or highly educated, continued to the highest level of voltage even knowing that the learner could possibly die at four hundred fifty volts. The participants were exposed to very stressful situations and caused three of the participants to have seizures, one so violent that the experiment was stopped. After the conclusion of the experiment and the participants had been told of the illusion only 1.3% of the participants stated that they wished they had not been

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalrymple begins analyzing Stanley Milgram’s experiment and begins to justify what happened in the experiment. The article described that Milgram’s demonstration was individuals that shocked subjects and tormented them simply because they needed to obey to power. Dalrymple expresses that despite the fact that Milgram proved even good people have the capability to…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Milgram’s experiment he uncovered that “For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct” (691). Most Germans carried out the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Hofling et al. have found the possible danger of obedience in different groups of people. In Milgram’s experiment the participants were 40 men in age range of 20-50 that can be described as average members of public. Hofling et al. conducted his study on 22 nurses.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is our environment that affects the choices that we make as human beings. The argument is, are we as humans, born with the intent of doing evil and we learn manners as we get older, or, are we as humans naturally trying to do good and what is right, but it can vary depending on your environment. William Golding, author of “Lord Of The Flies”, believes that we humans naturally do evil. While on the other side, Jean-Jacques Rousseau believes that it all depends on what kind of environment you are in. There was an experiment held based on Stanley Milgram’s views on how humans reacted when a high position of authority commanded you to do something.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the movie, A Few Good Men, there is controversy about obedience to authority when two marines follow an order believed to be unethical. Privates Dawson and Downey, carry out a “code red”, or hazing, of another member of the unit, and were put on trial for the unintentional murder of Private Santiago. Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist and author of “The Perils of Obedience” claims, “Some system of authority is a requirement of all communal living” (Milgram 78). Along with Milgram, Philip Zimbardo, and Erich Fromm also converse on the psychological issues regarding human behavior. Milgram’s test subjects were tricked into thinking they were electrically shocking someone if they answered a question wrong.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, Erich Fromm states that it is due to an act of disobedience that the human life began, and it is unlikely that human history will end through an act of obedience. To support his doctrine, Fromm draws a comparison to the story of Prometheus saying that mankind has started and continued to evolve with acts of disobedience. He also argues that he who does not disobey is referred to as a slave and thus someone who is not free. It is true that obeying orders that one does not agree with make him a coward; however, it does not make a him a slave either since it is vacuously known that obedience reveals knowledge and has a big role in the society’s completion. “Do your homework”, “stop talking in class”, “clean your room”.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays