Stanford Prison Experiment

Superior Essays
Secondarily discovered the experiment was the psychological impact of being in a verifiable position of power over ones’ peers, and how the ability to apply sanctions to those same peers can have an effect on one’s disposition. In order to unearth these effects, Professor Zimbardo collected 24 local Stanford students and gave a vague brief of the testing, including how they would be separated into ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’. The students were randomly chosen for either role, and after only 6 days, their abusive actions from the guards towards the prisoners forced the experiment to be shutdown. The way the prisoner students were collected was an important factor in the experiment as a whole, having the arrested by a legitimate police force …show more content…
The ethical quality of the test is undoubtedly controversial, but the question of if it obeyed to ethical standards is most certainly ‘yes’. Zimbardo met all the requirements, the subjects where volunteers, and able to leave at any time, something that a full quarter of the subjects did. Yes, this study was absolutely within grounds to have been held, the march of science developing through the actions of consenting individuals should not be stopped by the question of legality of a long-passed experiment. I have seen this test held under the same scope of those who question whether or not the data found by the Nazi scientists in concentration camps should be used. I’m under the impression that the conditions at Auschwitz-Birkenau had been incalculably times worse than the prison used in the Stanford experiment. Now that is not to say ‘ethics is relative’, but rather science is going to advance no matter what, and dismissing the findings of some horrible individuals would be counter-productive. In conclusion, yes the experiment met the ethical standards, and yes it should have been allowed. From my understanding of the experiment, it seems that the effect of the institutional setting and the ascribed social statues involved pushes the experiment into the realm of Karl Marx’s Conflict Theory. We have the lower …show more content…
The Bystander Effect has the most innocent reasoning, given the same example as above, perhaps the newcomer will see those around him not acting and come to the conclusion that everyone else are horrible for not helping, and will deviate from the norm of not helping. One may deviate from their role by simply forgoing all expected actions and activities and forge their own path, away from the role given to them by society. With Conflict Theory, all one would have to do deviate is believe they are ‘throwing off the shackles of their oppressors’, or some similar idea and attempt to break the cycle of Proletariat and oppressor. In the Distortion of Action, should one go with their own thoughts rather than those of others, they are deviating even if it is not to the extent of the other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was unlike any other experiment. It was supposed to be an experiment on how people would conform to the roles of guards and prisoners in a role-playing exercise. Over 70 students applied for the aid, but only 25 was selected and they would get paid 15 dollars a day for their participation in the experiment. They took the 25 college students from the university and turn half of them into guards and the other half into prisoners. The Abu Graib situation was way different in my opinion.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He not only played the role of a sociologist, but also a warden. He got caught up into his role, like the experimentees, and could not fully understand the extent of his wrongdoings (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Despite these observations, there is no proper explanations to why Zimbardo did not stop the experiment once he saw the first mental breakdown, or when he first saw the perpetuated abuse. Him, being a professional, should have known that he was breaking major rules of ethics by the results of his experiment. He should have put a stop to it, and thought about it from an ethical perspective.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is also something called the bystander effect which is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to situations in which individuals do not offer help to a victim when other people are present.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This piece is an outline of the Stanford Prison Experiment. To start the collection of resources, I decided to choose one that would most benefit someone unfamiliar with the Stanford Prison Experiment. It covers the general idea and procedure of the social experiment. I wanted my first source to be completely objective and to give anyone unfamiliar with the experiment an overview. This article would benefit a student writing a synthesis because it provides objective, straightforward facts.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like Lord of the Flies, the experiment presented set rules and morals that stated how an individual should act towards one another, causing not only the guards, but the prisoners to fall into internal decadence. Through the sickening experience, the power the “guards” had most definitely got into their heads. “The Stanford Prison Experiment degenerated very quickly and the evil and inhuman side of human nature became apparent very quickly.” Also proven in the experiment is that the environment played a huge factor with the result of the guards beginning to harass the prisoners and play a more savage…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 14th 1971, Philip Zimbardo got 24 healthy male students together and started the Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment was held in Jordan Hall, which is Stanford University’s psychological building. The study was about observing the students’ psychological behavior as they were playing a role as a prisoner or a prison guard. Out of the 24, there were 12 prisoners and 12 guards (6 of which were alternatives), and they were all payed $15 everyday to be apart of all this for 7-14 days. Zimbardo himself took part in this experiment as a superintendent.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, author of "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," states that everyone is subjected to be a possible torturer (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Szegedy-Maszak asserts, the "unconscionable acts" committed by the Abu Ghraib were likely caused by "the anxiety and helplessness" of their horrific living conditions (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Philip G. Zimbardo, author of "The Stanford Prison Experiment," attempts to clarify the reasoning and motivation behind the sadistic acts in situations similar to the Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal. Zimbardo conducted a study where twenty-one male college students were paid fifteen dollars a day to participate in a, "mock prison," to study the psychological behavior projected from a simulated prison…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manipulation and Control Experiments are used to get a better understanding of things. They help expand our knowledge on anything from diseases, mental illnesses, and why we as human beings act the way we do. In Stanley Milgram’s experiment “The Perils of Obedience” and Phillip Zimbardo’s “The Stanford Prison Experiment” we learned just how far some would go with the power they are given. Zimbardo’s and Milgram’s experiments showed how having the slightest bit of power can corrupt one’s morals.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the past there have been experiments conducted that have done more harm and little to no good. There is a line that can be crossed between a toll being taken for the greater good versus people being exploited and put in harm’s way. There can be a larger benefit to society for the sacrifice that people have made. However, there are several experiments that cross that line and have little to no benefit to society or the greater good. People should not suffer for trivial findings, nor should people be treated in an unethical way for an experiment.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code for human experimentation. It would appear that the policy maker’s hubris is only matched by their subject’s…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays