Stanford Prison Experiment Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo, a psychologist who wanted to test the conflict that volunteers would experience when put in situations where they were not in control. This experiment took men of the same ages and put them in a “prison” setting, giving them each the label of either guard or inmate. By grouping these men together in separate categories it demonstrated a form a social control. According to James Henslin, author of the book “Sociology: A Down- To- Earth Approach,” social control can be defined as the techniques and strategies employed to prevent deviant behavior in any society. (Henslin, 2010.) After being placed in the experiment, Zimbardo observed the volunteers and was seeking to document …show more content…
After the second day, some of the prisoners started to rebel. They no longer wanted to obey the orders of the guards and comply with them. As an act of rebellion, they barricaded the doors with their beds and anything they could find in their rooms. Some asked to leave the experiment and no longer wanted to participate. When this occurred, the guards became angry and tore down the obstacles the prisoners made in their rooms. The guards then stripped the prisoners naked and ridiculed them throughout the night. Prisoner #8612 started to act “crazy” in an attempt to gain his freedom from the guards. He began to scream and cry to show the guards that this experiment was affecting him in ways that he could no longer tolerate. His behavior resulted in escalated control and dominance by the guards, and they began to harass the inmates. These were the techniques that enforced social control and made them not want to stray away from the social norms of the prison. For the rest of the experiment the relationship between the guards and the inmates changed and they started to neglect each …show more content…
He stopped it because he realized his experiment was causing all the participants to suffer, and he felt that he did not have the right to manipulate the volunteers in such a dramatic way. After this six day experiment, Zimbardo concluded that humans will react in new ways and change their behavior based on the roles that they are given or placed in. He saw first-hand the lengths that seemingly normal people would go to enforce and obey authority, even when it resulted in harming others. He also concluded that these individuals likely would not have aced the way they did if they were not placed in this

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The book “Ordinary Men” describes the Police Batallion, a subset of the Order Police, who directly participated in the massacre of Jewish civilians in Poland of 1942. The author of “Ordinary Men”, Christopher Browning analyzes the testimonies made by the members of the Batallion in the 1960s, and tries to understand how any sane man was capable of performing the horrible deeds committed by these ordinary men. Browning takes a psychological standpoint in analyzing the motivation behind these killings, and generates multiple theories as to how a common man, previously a law-abiding citizen, can morph into a killer in such a short time. Browning assesses these theories, and tries to see if there’s any validity in them. When one is learning about the Holocaust, there is one question the general public always has: why did they do it?…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the third day, it was the first time a prisoner had an emotional/nervous breakdown, prisoner 8612 was willing to go to a doctor or any alternative to get him out of that prison. The guards all believed this was an act and that the prisoner was weak and unstable. The next day the guards escalated their actions and their power by then having some prisoners clean out toilets with their bare hands, degraded some in front of the rest, and other unusual acts of embarrassment involving sexual…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine you are a student at Stanford University in the 1970s, and you hear that a psychologist is offering $15 per day to take part in his experiment. You figure that you could use the extra cash and figure that it’s a good way to help out. You and 20 other students are accepted to participate, and you are split into two groups, prisoners and guards. The only instructions given were “...do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners. No physical violence [is] permitted.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the experiment, one set of people were prisoners and the other were guards. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate how people would act when given no rules in a prison. (Shuttleworth 3). The experiment showed that when taken away from society and civilization, people turn into savages and become more evil as time goes on. In this case, some people were given more power than others, therefore they overused it due to their natural selfish state.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A basement was turned into a mock prison, and hired students to be the guards and prisoners. The prisoners were grabbed at their homes by the guards and brought in and treated like real criminals to keep the experiment as real as possible. The guards worked in groups of threes for eight hour shifts and then switched. Zimbardo monitored everything and acted as the prison's warden, both the prisoners and guards adapted quickly to their new found roles. Within hours some guards started acting in a brutal and sadistic manner, and soon after more joined in.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners were treated as a real inmate would be, they wore uniforms, ate prison food, and slept in cells. On the other hand the guards wore reflective sunglasses, uniforms, and conducted daily activity in the “prison”. This experiments effects set into place so quickly that what was meant to last for two weeks only lasted six days due to the extreme effects on both the prisoners and the guards. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine Zimbardo states, “They start off playing a game, and then there is a point at which they each, one by one, flip and become more and more extreme.” (Zimbardo).…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ideal example of the emotional effect on prisoners is prisoner #8162. With less than 36 hours passing, #8162 began to suffer extreme emotional distress, sorrow, disorganized thinking, and anger. He became engulfed in the experiment and forgot that it was fake, telling other prisoners they cannot leave and then going on psychotic rages. Because of the severe effects he was suffering from, the researchers had not choice but to let him leave, making him understand that the prison was fabricated for an experiment that he volunteered for. Considering these findings, the conclusion for the Stanford Prison Experiment is that people will gladly conform to the social roles of their specific environment and take on the tendencies of their stereotyped roles (institutional power).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They acted out during roll call, complained about the food, and talked back. At the end of the sixth day, the three insubordinate cellmates broke out and occupied the guards’ quarters.” (Konnikova). Instead of the guards acting out, this time the prisoner did.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘Prisoners’ on the other hand, lost their own identity in the process of becoming a ‘prisoner’. They lost sight of their own uniqueness and become like other ‘prisoners’. The also lost all sense of control because they felt unsure of how to react to the ‘guards’ and be perceived as defiant, and therefore be exposed to aggression from the ‘guards’. Finally, the loss of control within the mock prison, led them to realize they never want to lose power and control and therefore, they strive to gain control back in their lives…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This piece is an outline of the Stanford Prison Experiment. To start the collection of resources, I decided to choose one that would most benefit someone unfamiliar with the Stanford Prison Experiment. It covers the general idea and procedure of the social experiment. I wanted my first source to be completely objective and to give anyone unfamiliar with the experiment an overview. This article would benefit a student writing a synthesis because it provides objective, straightforward facts.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment (August 1971) was conducted by Philip Zimbardo and his peers at Stanford University to investigate the effects of 24 physically and mentally healthy male college students becoming guards or prisoners. One of the key elements present throughout the experiment was deindividuation, the loss of one’s sense of individuality. In deindividuation, the social identity consumes an individual completely in order for group norms to be maximally accessible. The central question of this report is, how can the events of the Stanford Prison Experiment be explained through the theory of deindividuation?…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the guards won’t let the prisoners tell their parents that they are being tortured and beaten. The guards had the prisoners write letters to their parents but they never shipped the letters out so none of the letters got to their parents. The guards got so mean and rude to the prisoners that they started to have mental breakdowns because they started to I believe that they were in prison. This caused The Stanford Prison Experiment to end after 6 days instead of lasting 2 weeks. This experiment affected the prisoners so much that those prisoners had to get a therapist to help them with their problem.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays